O. Hölck

744 citations
60 papers · 579 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

O. Hölck

59 papers receiving 559 citations

Peers

O. Hölck
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Polymers and Plastics 134
  • Mechanical Engineering 249
  • Mechanics of Materials 126
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 229
  • Materials Chemistry 158
Replace Kun Hu with:
Kun Hu China
Bowen Yu China
Wenjun Tan China
Ke Shan China
Bin Shi China
Christof Nagel Germany
Cheng‐Yu He China
Mohammad Arab Pour Yazdi France
Pouyan Motamedi Canada
Vladimír Holcman Czechia
O. Hölck relative to Kun Hu China Kun Hu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Kun Hu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by O. Hölck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of O. Hölck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by O. Hölck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites O. Hölck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by O. Hölck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by O. Hölck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by O. Hölck. The network helps show where O. Hölck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside O. Hölck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with O. Hölck Line = papers co-authored together O. Hölck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201270
2 200649
3 200637
4 202129
5 200728
6 198028
7 201027
8 201725
9 201218
10 201415
11 201412
12 201212
13 201111
14 201411
15 200311
16 200911
17 202210
18 202110
19 201110
20 20229

About O. Hölck

O. Hölck is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 60 papers that have together received 579 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies (17 papers), Epoxy Resin Curing Processes (11 papers), 3D IC and TSV technologies (11 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Polymer crystallization and properties (10 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (9 papers), Mechanical Behavior of Composites (7 papers) and Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Polymers and Plastics (134 citations), Mechanical Engineering (249 citations), Mechanics of Materials (126 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (229 citations) and Materials Chemistry (158 citations). O. Hölck has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Denmark and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Martin Böhning, Matthias Heuchel, Martin Siegert, Bernhard Wunderle, Dieter Hofmann, B. Michel, Steffen Hartmann, H. Walter, Olaf Wittler and J. Bauer. Their work appears in journals such as Microelectronics Reliability, Journal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer Physics, Solar Energy, Macromolecules and Journal of Membrane Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact