O. G. Tchikilev

1.7k total citations
29 papers, 220 citations indexed

About

O. G. Tchikilev is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Condensed Matter Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, O. G. Tchikilev has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 220 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 3 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and 2 papers in Condensed Matter Physics. Recurrent topics in O. G. Tchikilev's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (23 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (23 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (19 papers). O. G. Tchikilev is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (23 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (23 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (19 papers). O. G. Tchikilev collaborates with scholars based in Russia, Belgium and France. O. G. Tchikilev's co-authors include P. Chliapnikov, V. Uvarov, F. Verbeure, L. Mosca, E. A. De Wolf, Christophe Dujardin, R. Windmolders, J. Saudraix, L. Gerdyukov and V.V. Kniazev and has published in prestigious journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Physics Letters B and The European Physical Journal C.

In The Last Decade

O. G. Tchikilev

26 papers receiving 214 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
O. G. Tchikilev Russia	10	184	27	27	24	10	29	220
A. Shindler Germany	9	364 2.0×	8 0.3×	14 0.5×	5 0.2×	13 1.3×	15	383
Tong-Zhi Yang Switzerland	11	365 2.0×	6 0.2×	9 0.3×	21 0.9×	12 1.2×	19	387
A. Dąbrowska Poland	8	130 0.7×	14 0.5×	7 0.3×	6 0.3×	3 0.3×	26	148
F. Marzano Italy	10	249 1.4×	8 0.3×	4 0.1×	8 0.3×	5 0.5×	18	290
Z. Sroczynski United Kingdom	7	285 1.5×	11 0.4×	16 0.6×	3 0.1×	11 1.1×	13	311
A. Spitz Germany	11	302 1.6×	4 0.1×	18 0.7×	7 0.3×	5 0.5×	20	313
M. Pimiä Finland	9	154 0.8×	10 0.4×	3 0.1×	6 0.3×	8 0.8×	21	174
J. Viehoff Germany	13	344 1.9×	4 0.1×	21 0.8×	7 0.3×	4 0.4×	22	360
D. Du United States	5	110 0.6×	34 1.3×	5 0.2×	4 0.2×	26 2.6×	6	119
Marina Krstić Marinković Switzerland	8	290 1.6×	12 0.4×	2 0.1×	17 0.7×	11 1.1×	30	308

Countries citing papers authored by O. G. Tchikilev

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of O. G. Tchikilev's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by O. G. Tchikilev with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites O. G. Tchikilev more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by O. G. Tchikilev

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by O. G. Tchikilev. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by O. G. Tchikilev. The network helps show where O. G. Tchikilev may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of O. G. Tchikilev

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of O. G. Tchikilev. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of O. G. Tchikilev based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with O. G. Tchikilev. O. G. Tchikilev is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Duk, V., В.Н. Болотов, Valeri Lebedev, et al.. (2012). Search for heavy neutrino in K−→μ−νh(νh→νγ) decay at ISTRA+ setup. Physics Letters B. 710(2). 307–317. 10 indexed citations

Болотов, В.Н., Valeri Lebedev, A. Makarov, et al.. (2010). Extraction of kaon formfactors from K−→μ−νγ decay at ISTRA+ setup. Physics Letters B. 695(1-4). 59–66. 9 indexed citations

Tchikilev, O. G.. (1996). Multiplicity distributions at LEP1.5 and LEP2 energies, modified negative binomial and evidence for asymptotic number of clusters. Physics Letters B. 382(3). 296–298. 5 indexed citations

Chliapnikov, P., O. G. Tchikilev, & V. Uvarov. (1995). Regularities in multiplicity distributions for e+e− annihilation into hadrons. Physics Letters B. 352(3-4). 461–466. 14 indexed citations

Agababyan, N. M., F. Botterweck, P. Chliapnikov, et al.. (1993). Factorial moments, cumulants and correlation integrals in ?+ p andK + p interactions at 250 GeV/c. The European Physical Journal C. 59(3). 405–426. 25 indexed citations

Agababyan, N. M., H. Boettcher, F. Botterweck, et al.. (1991). Deuteron production in collisions of 250 GeV/c π+ andK + mesons with Al and Au nuclei. The European Physical Journal C. 52(2). 231–238.

Chliapnikov, P. & O. G. Tchikilev. (1990). KNO scaling as a property of stochastic branching processes. Physics Letters B. 235(3-4). 347–350. 5 indexed citations

Chliapnikov, P. & O. G. Tchikilev. (1990). A new regularity for the multiplicity distribution in place of the negative binomial. Physics Letters B. 242(2). 275–278. 16 indexed citations

Chliapnikov, P. & O. G. Tchikilev. (1989). Some regularities of charged-particle multiplicity distributions and branching processes. Physics Letters B. 223(1). 119–122. 10 indexed citations

10.

Chliapnikov, P., P. Gorbunov, Stanislav Klimenko, et al.. (1980). Study of the inclusive reaction K+p → Δ++(1232) + X0 at 32 GeV/c. Nuclear Physics B. 164. 189–213. 2 indexed citations

11.

Chliapnikov, P., L. Gerdyukov, V.V. Kniazev, et al.. (1980). Observation of a narrowK s 0 K s 0 ?+?? state at 1.97 GeV produced inK + p interactions at 32 GeV/c. The European Physical Journal C. 3(4). 285–287.

12.

Ajinenko, I., V. Bryzgalov, P. Chliapnikov, et al.. (1980). InclusiveK *+(892) andK *0(892) production inK + p interactions at 32 GeV/c. The European Physical Journal C. 5(3). 177–193. 12 indexed citations

13.

Ajinenko, I., А.А. Боровиков, P. Chliapnikov, et al.. (1980). Inclusive strange particle production in π+p interactions at 32 GeV/c. Nuclear Physics B. 165(1). 1–18. 3 indexed citations

14.

Ajinenko, I., P. Chliapnikov, L. Gerdyukov, et al.. (1980). Inclusive production of and Ξ− in K+ p interactions at 32 GeV/c. Nuclear Physics B. 176(1). 51–60. 5 indexed citations

15.

Ajinenko, I., P. Chliapnikov, L. Gerdyukov, et al.. (1980). Observation in K+p interactions at 32 GeV/c of a narrow state at 2145 MeV/c2 decaying into øπ+. Physics Letters B. 95(3-4). 451–456. 9 indexed citations

16.

Laurent, Jean‐Paul, Christophe Dujardin, F. Grard, et al.. (1979). Study of the inclusive reactions K+p → pX and K+p → pK0X at 32 GeV/c. Nuclear Physics B. 149(2). 189–210. 8 indexed citations

17.

Givernaud, A., C. Cochet, D. Denegri, et al.. (1979). Non-diffractive two-body channels in reactions K+p→K0π+p and K+p→K+π−π+p at 32 Gev/c. Nuclear Physics B. 153. 280–298. 6 indexed citations

18.

Ajinenko, I., V. Bryzgalov, P. Chliapnikov, et al.. (1978). An analysis of K+ p interactions at 32 GeV/c in terms of “principal-axis” variables. Nuclear Physics B. 135(3). 365–378. 5 indexed citations

19.

Chliapnikov, P., L. Gerdyukov, O. G. Tchikilev, et al.. (1975). Determination of the K+π− total cross section for c.m. energy up to 1.8 GeV. Nuclear Physics B. 91(3). 413–424. 3 indexed citations

20.

Chliapnikov, P., P. Gorbunov, Stanislav Klimenko, et al.. (1975). Study of the inclusive reaction K + p→p+X at 32GeV/c. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact