F. Botterweck

2.7k citations
8 papers · 41 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

    • High-Energy Particle Collisions Research 7
    • Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions 6
    • Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies 5
    • Nuclear physics research studies 1
    • Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism 1
    • Theoretical and Computational Physics 1

F. Botterweck

7 papers receiving 41 citations

Peers

F. Botterweck
Comparison fields: 5 of 11
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 36
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 10
  • Condensed Matter Physics 7
  • Mathematical Physics 5
  • Statistics and Probability 4
Replace N. M. Agababyan with:
N. M. Agababyan Russia
K. Dziunikowska Poland
Л. Н. Смирнова Russia
J. J. Dumont Belgium
Н. Акопов Armenia
R. Kobayashi Japan
P. Brockill Canada
K. N. Barish United States
L. Carminati France
M. Zeyrek Taiwan
F. Botterweck relative to N. M. Agababyan Russia N. M. Agababyan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
N. M. Agababyan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Botterweck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Botterweck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Botterweck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Botterweck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Botterweck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Botterweck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Botterweck. The network helps show where F. Botterweck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Botterweck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Botterweck Line = papers co-authored together F. Botterweck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 199325
2 19925
3 19944
4 19934
5 19921
6 19931
7 19921
8 19910

About F. Botterweck

F. Botterweck is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Condensed Matter Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability and Infectious Diseases, having authored 8 papers that have together received 41 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (7 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (6 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (5 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (1 paper), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (1 paper), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (1 paper), Theoretical and Computational Physics (1 paper) and Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (36 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (10 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (7 citations), Mathematical Physics (5 citations) and Statistics and Probability (4 citations). F. Botterweck has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Russia. Frequent co-authors include A. Tomaradze, P. Chliapnikov, E. Shabalina, W. Kittel, E. A. De Wolf, D. Kisielewska, K. Olkiewicz, R. S. Hakobyan, M. Charlet and F. Verbeure. Their work appears in journals such as The European Physical Journal C and Physics Letters B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact