Noboru Endou

404 citations
70 papers · 290 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Noboru Endou

63 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Noboru Endou
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Mathematical Physics 95
  • Geometry and Topology 82
  • Applied Mathematics 95
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 122
  • Statistics and Probability 56
Replace S. M. Srivastava with:
S. M. Srivastava India
Julius Borcea Sweden
Radu Miculescu Romania
A. C. Thompson Canada
Daniel Azagra Spain
Ondrej Hutník Slovakia
B. Nagy Hungary
Juan Ferrera Spain
Ştefan Cobzaş Romania
Piotr Graczyk France
Noboru Endou relative to S. M. Srivastava India S. M. Srivastava's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
S. M. Srivastava · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Noboru Endou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Noboru Endou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noboru Endou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noboru Endou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Noboru Endou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noboru Endou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noboru Endou. The network helps show where Noboru Endou may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Noboru Endou, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Noboru Endou Line = papers co-authored together Noboru Endou links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200622
2 200715
3
Completeness of the Real Euclidean Space
200514
4 201113
5 200812
6 200711
7
The Definition of the Riemann Definite Integral and some Related Lemmas
199911
8 200611
9 20159
10 20079
11 20088
12 20067
13 20087
14 20117
15 20066
16 20086
17 20085
18 20175
19 20165
20 20215

About Noboru Endou

Noboru Endou is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Applied Mathematics and Statistics and Probability, having authored 70 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fixed Point Theorems Analysis (19 papers), Approximation Theory and Sequence Spaces (17 papers), Functional Equations Stability Results (13 papers), Optimization and Variational Analysis (12 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (12 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (10 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (6 papers) and Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (95 citations), Geometry and Topology (82 citations), Applied Mathematics (95 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (122 citations) and Statistics and Probability (56 citations). Noboru Endou has collaborated with scholars based in Japan and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Yasunari Shidama, Hiroshi Yamazaki, Grzegorz Bancerek and Adam Naumowicz. Their work appears in journals such as Formalized Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact