Noam Lubell
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 10%
- Safety Research
- History
- Topics
- International Law and Human Rights (14 papers)Global Peace and Security Dynamics (8 papers)International Law and Aviation (2 papers)
- Journals
- Human Rights QuarterlyInternational Review of the Red CrossJournal of International Criminal Justice
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Noam Lubell
15 papers receiving 88 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Political Science and International Relations 89
- Sociology and Political Science 43
- Philosophy 19
- Safety Research 11
- History 7
Countries citing papers authored by Noam Lubell
This map shows the geographic impact of Noam Lubell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noam Lubell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noam Lubell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Noam Lubell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noam Lubell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noam Lubell. The network helps show where Noam Lubell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Noam Lubell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Noam Lubell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Noam Lubell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Noam Lubell. Noam Lubell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strategic Proportionality: Limitations on the Use of Force in Modern Armed Conflicts | 4 |
| 2 | Guidelines on Investigating Violations of International Humanitarian Law: Law, Policy, and Good Practice | 0 |
| 3 | Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, and the Use of Force by States | 14 |
| 4 | Fragmented Wars: Multi-Territorial Military Operations against Armed Groups | 2 |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Amicus Curiae Brief, Georgia v. Russia (II), 38263/08 | 0 |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 39 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | Applicability of Human Rights Law in Situations of Occupation | 1 |
| 17 | Medical Investigation and Documentation of Torture: A Handbook for Health Professionals | 1 |
| 18 | 8 |
About Noam Lubell
Noam Lubell is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 18 papers that have together received 107 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Law and Human Rights (14 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (8 papers) and International Law and Aviation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (89 citations), Philosophy (19 citations) and Safety Research (11 citations). Noam Lubell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ashley S. Deeks, Daragh Murray, Christian Henderson, Françoise Hampson and Jelena Pejić. Their work appears in journals such as Human Rights Quarterly, International Review of the Red Cross and Journal of International Criminal Justice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.