Noam Gidron
- Political Science and International Relations top 0.2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Communication top 1%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Peter A. HallBart BonikowskiWill HorneJames AdamsRyan EnosDaniel ZiblattLior ShefferJonathan Mijs
- Topics
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation (23 papers)Populism, Right-Wing Movements (22 papers)Social Media and Politics (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- IsraelUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Noam Gidron
30 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Political Science and International Relations 1.4k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.0k
- Communication 392
- Gender Studies 116
- Artificial Intelligence 84
Countries citing papers authored by Noam Gidron
This map shows the geographic impact of Noam Gidron's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noam Gidron with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noam Gidron more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Noam Gidron
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noam Gidron. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noam Gidron. The network helps show where Noam Gidron may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Noam Gidron
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Noam Gidron. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Noam Gidron based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Noam Gidron. Noam Gidron is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | Who Dislikes Whom? Affective Polarization between Pairs of Parties in Western Democraciesbreakdown → | 67 |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 49 | |
| 13 | American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspectivebreakdown → | 241 |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | Toward a Comparative Research Agenda on Affective Polarization in Mass Publics | 65 |
| 16 | Populism as a Problem of Social Integrationbreakdown → | 252 |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | Institutional Gardening: The Supreme Court in Economic Liberalization | 2 |
| 20 | The politics of social status: economic and cultural roots of the populist rightbreakdown → | 418 |
About Noam Gidron
Noam Gidron is a scholar working on Communication, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (23 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (22 papers) and Social Media and Politics (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (1.4k citations), Communication (392 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.0k citations). Noam Gidron has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter A. Hall, Bart Bonikowski, Will Horne, James Adams, Ryan Enos, Daniel Ziblatt, Lior Sheffer, Jonathan Mijs, Roee Levy and Yuval Feldman. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, American Political Science Review and Social Forces.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.