Noah Moxham
-
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research 3
-
- History of Science and Natural History 6
- Historical Philosophy and Science 4
- Philosophy and History of Science 2
- History of Science and Medicine 2
- Publishing and Scholarly Communication 1
- Anthropology top 10%
- Historical and Literary Studies 3
- History top 10%
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 2
Noah Moxham
15 papers receiving 228 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 99
- History and Philosophy of Science 57
- Information Systems and Management 60
- Anthropology 29
- History 24
Countries citing papers authored by Noah Moxham
This map shows the geographic impact of Noah Moxham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noah Moxham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noah Moxham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Noah Moxham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noah Moxham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noah Moxham. The network helps show where Noah Moxham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Noah Moxham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 113 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 49 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 10 | A pre-history of ‘peer review’ : refereeing and editorial selection at the Royal Society | 2016 | 1 |
| 11 | 2016 | 28 | |
| 12 | 350 years of the scientific journal: celebrating the anniversary of Philosophical Transactions | 2015 | 1 |
| 13 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 14 | Philosophical Transactions : 350 years of publishing at the Royal Society (1665 – 2015) | 2014 | 6 |
| 15 | 2012 | 1 |
About Noah Moxham
Noah Moxham is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Anthropology, Marketing and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 255 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Natural History (6 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (4 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers), History of Science and Medicine (2 papers) and Publishing and Scholarly Communication (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (99 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (57 citations), Information Systems and Management (60 citations), Anthropology (29 citations) and History (24 citations). Noah Moxham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Aileen Fyfe, Camilla Mørk Røstvik, Stephen Curry, Stuart Lawson, Kelly Coate and Joad Raymond. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal for the History of Science, Centaurus, The Historical Journal, Victorian periodicals review and Notes and Records the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.