Ning Ding

1.2k citations
58 papers · 905 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Ning Ding

51 papers receiving 882 citations

Peers

Ning Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 181
  • Biological Psychiatry 49
  • Neurology 93
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 171
  • Pharmacology 98
Replace Xiao‐Li Dong with:
Xiao‐Li Dong China
Tao Liang China
Liping Xu China
Tianlong Liu China
Neveen A. Salem Egypt
Zehui Li China
Xuemei Lin China
Zhigang Mei China
Gürkan Yiğittürk Türkiye
Ning Ding relative to Xiao‐Li Dong China Xiao‐Li Dong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Xiao‐Li Dong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ning Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ning Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ning Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ning Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ning Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ning Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ning Ding. The network helps show where Ning Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ning Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ning Ding Line = papers co-authored together Ning Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019205
2 201946
3 201844
4 199741
5 199438
6 201837
7 201836
8 202035
9 201334
10 202233
11 201129
12 202126
13 202224
14 201722
15 201719
16 202018
17 201018
18 201915
19 201913
20 201812

About Ning Ding

Ning Ding is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Pharmacology, Physiology and Neurology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 905 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (10 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (5 papers), Gut microbiota and health (4 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (3 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (3 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (3 papers), Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers) and Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (181 citations), Biological Psychiatry (49 citations), Neurology (93 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (171 citations) and Pharmacology (98 citations). Ning Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Zhigang Li, Jing Jiang, Shoji Yahara, Toshihiro Nohara, James K. Sheffield, Amit Bar‐Or, Douglas L. Arnold, Bruce Cree, Eva Havrdová and Gıancarlo Comı. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Neuroscience, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Medicine, Fitoterapia and Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact