Nina Wilén
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Development top 2%
- History top 10%
- Co-authors
- Lindy HeineckenPaul WilliamsFilip ReyntjensAndrea PurdekováJonathan FisherKseniya OksamytnaBert IngelaereLisa Strömbom
- Topics
- Peacebuilding and International Security (22 papers)Global Peace and Security Dynamics (18 papers)Gender, Security, and Conflict (10 papers)
In The Last Decade
Nina Wilén
32 papers receiving 260 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Sociology and Political Science 246
- Political Science and International Relations 157
- Gender Studies 81
- Development 69
- History 15
Countries citing papers authored by Nina Wilén
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Wilén's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Wilén with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Wilén more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Wilén
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Wilén. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Wilén. The network helps show where Nina Wilén may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Wilén
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Wilén. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Wilén based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Wilén. Nina Wilén is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | A Logic of its Own: the external presence in the Sahel | 2 |
| 7 | What’s the ‘added value’ of Male Peacekeepers? (Or why we should stop instrumentalising Female Peacekeepers’ Participation | 3 |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | Justifying interventions in Africa : (de)stabilizing sovereignty in Liberia, Burundi and the Congo | 3 |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | International Administration of Foreign Territories and Sovereignty: An impossible Equation | 1 |
About Nina Wilén
Nina Wilén is a scholar working on Development, Gender Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 36 papers that have together received 296 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Peacebuilding and International Security (22 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (18 papers) and Gender, Security, and Conflict (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (69 citations), Gender Studies (81 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (157 citations). Nina Wilén has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Canada and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Lindy Heinecken, Paul Williams, Filip Reyntjens, Andrea Purdeková, Jonathan Fisher, Kseniya Oksamytna, Bert Ingelaere and Lisa Strömbom. Their work appears in journals such as International Affairs, Third World Quarterly and Gender Work and Organization.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.