Nina Westera

48 papers receiving 517 citations

Peers

Nina Westera
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Gender Studies 193
  • Health 104
  • Law 78
  • Political Science and International Relations 185
  • Social Psychology 142
Replace Jeffrey E. Pfeifer with:
Jeffrey E. Pfeifer Australia
Katrin Mueller‐Johnson United Kingdom
Ráchael A. Powers United States
Andre Kehn United States
Fiona Brookman United Kingdom
Jane B. Sprott Canada
Marla Sandys United States
Caroline Angel United States
Steffen Bieneck Germany
Curt R. Bartol United States
Nina Westera relative to Jeffrey E. Pfeifer Australia Jeffrey E. Pfeifer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Jeffrey E. Pfeifer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Westera

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Westera's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Westera with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Westera more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Westera

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Westera. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Westera. The network helps show where Nina Westera may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Nina Westera, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nina Westera Line = papers co-authored together Nina Westera links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201843
2 201535
3 201633
4 201630
5 201429
6 201128
7 201626
8 201624
9 201824
10 201221
11 201419
12
An evaluation of how evidence is elicited from complainants of child sexual abuse
201619
13 201118
14 201516
15 201615
16
Losing two thirds of the story: A comparison of the video-recorded police interview and live evidence of rape complainants
201314
17 201713
18 201513
19
Promoting pre-recorded complainant evidence in rape trials: Psychological and practice perspectives
201111
20 201410

About Nina Westera

Nina Westera is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, Law and Clinical Psychology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (32 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (17 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (17 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (13 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (13 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (7 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (193 citations), Health (104 citations), Law (78 citations), Political Science and International Relations (185 citations) and Social Psychology (142 citations). Nina Westera has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Mark R. Kebbell, Martine B. Powell, Geoffrey P. Alpert, Louise Porter, Rachel Zajac, Rebecca Milne, Jane Goodman‐Delahunty, Andrea Allen, Stephen Moston and Blake M. McKimmie. Their work appears in journals such as Policing & Society, Applied Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry Psychology and Law, Child Abuse & Neglect and Psychology Crime and Law.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact