Nina Van Dyke
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 5%
- Co-authors
- Eric J. DrinkwaterRoss WilliamsTanya E. DavisonBarbara MasserCarley N. GemelliMichael SpittleDebra RickwoodNic Telford
- Topics
- Blood donation and transfusion practices (9 papers)Organ Donation and Transplantation (8 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nina Van Dyke
30 papers receiving 502 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Clinical Psychology 216
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 192
- Education 112
- Political Science and International Relations 110
- Management of Technology and Innovation 87
Countries citing papers authored by Nina Van Dyke
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Van Dyke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Van Dyke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Van Dyke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Van Dyke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Van Dyke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Van Dyke. The network helps show where Nina Van Dyke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Van Dyke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Van Dyke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Van Dyke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Van Dyke. Nina Van Dyke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 34 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Australian investment in education: higher education | 12 |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | The role of loyalty programs in gambling: final report of findings from audit of electronic gaming machine gambling venues, literature review, online discussion boards and longitudinal telephone survey | 4 |
| 17 | 200 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | 62 | |
| 20 | The International Standing of Australian Universities | 20 |
About Nina Van Dyke
Nina Van Dyke is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Applied Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 548 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood donation and transfusion practices (9 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (8 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (87 citations), Applied Psychology (60 citations) and Clinical Psychology (216 citations). Nina Van Dyke has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Eric J. Drinkwater, Ross Williams, Tanya E. Davison, Barbara Masser, Carley N. Gemelli, Michael Spittle, Debra Rickwood, Nic Telford, Anthony Watt and Rachel Thorpe. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, BMC Public Health and BMC Medical Research Methodology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.