Nina Tamminen
- Co-authors
- Pia SolinJaakko ReinikainenKaija Appelqvist‐SchmidlechnerTarja KettunenTomi Mäki‐OpasTuija MartelinKatja BorodulinTimo Partonen
- Topics
- Health, psychology, and well-being (11 papers)Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (9 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthBMC Public Health
In The Last Decade
Nina Tamminen
23 papers receiving 218 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Social Psychology 87
- General Health Professions 80
- Clinical Psychology 79
- Health 62
- Physiology 37
Countries citing papers authored by Nina Tamminen
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Tamminen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Tamminen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Tamminen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Tamminen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Tamminen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Tamminen. The network helps show where Nina Tamminen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Tamminen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Tamminen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Tamminen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Tamminen. Nina Tamminen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | Does physical fitness and parenting transformational style predict happiness and wellbeing and distress in adolescents | 1 |
| 10 | 72 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | Nuorten kokema positiivinen mielenterveys perhetaustan mukaan | 1 |
| 14 | Mental health promotion competencies in the health sector in Finland: a qualitative study of the views of professionals | 0 |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | Asiakkaan voimaantuminen mielenterveyspalveluissa. Tarkastelussa WHO:n voimaantumisen indikaattorit | 1 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Nina Tamminen
Nina Tamminen is a scholar working on Health, Speech and Hearing and Social Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 225 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health, psychology, and well-being (11 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (9 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (62 citations), Social Psychology (87 citations) and Clinical Psychology (79 citations). Nina Tamminen has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Denmark and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Pia Solin, Jaakko Reinikainen, Kaija Appelqvist‐Schmidlechner, Tarja Kettunen, Tomi Mäki‐Opas, Tuija Martelin, Katja Borodulin, Timo Partonen, Lasse Kannas and Eija Stengård. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and BMC Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.