Nina Strohminger

2.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
24 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Nina Strohminger is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Nina Strohminger has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 13 papers in Social Psychology and 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Nina Strohminger's work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (6 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers). Nina Strohminger is often cited by papers focused on Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (6 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers). Nina Strohminger collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Singapore. Nina Strohminger's co-authors include Shaun Nichols, George E. Newman, Joshua Knobe, Richard L. Lewis, David E. Meyer, Liane Young, Larisa Heiphetz, Victor Kumar, Kurt Gray and David Melnikoff and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychological Science and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Nina Strohminger

22 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The essential moral self

2014 337 citations Nina Strohminger, Shaun Nichols Cognition profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nina Strohminger United States	14	724	580	480	174	125	24	1.2k
Jennifer Cole Wright United States	20	524 0.7×	387 0.7×	405 0.8×	64 0.4×	83 0.7×	43	991
Andrew E. Monroe United States	14	856 1.2×	542 0.9×	560 1.2×	66 0.4×	125 1.0×	25	1.3k
Thomas Nadelhoffer United States	22	1.2k 1.7×	372 0.6×	403 0.8×	139 0.8×	132 1.1×	42	1.6k
Steve Guglielmo United States	11	624 0.9×	418 0.7×	420 0.9×	70 0.4×	87 0.7×	17	926
Aaron Ben‐Ze’ev Israel	14	328 0.5×	506 0.9×	411 0.9×	215 1.2×	132 1.1×	69	1.1k
Jason M. Cowell United States	15	715 1.0×	722 1.2×	350 0.7×	232 1.3×	337 2.7×	23	1.6k
Bryce Huebner United States	18	617 0.9×	408 0.7×	300 0.6×	109 0.6×	49 0.4×	36	981
Victoria McGeer United States	16	501 0.7×	275 0.5×	262 0.5×	160 0.9×	103 0.8×	31	1.0k
Oliver R. Goodenough United States	16	877 1.2×	473 0.8×	199 0.4×	85 0.5×	242 1.9×	36	1.3k
Jonathan Phillips United States	16	538 0.7×	274 0.5×	221 0.5×	91 0.5×	30 0.2×	40	844

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Strohminger

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Strohminger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Strohminger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Strohminger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Strohminger

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Strohminger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Strohminger. The network helps show where Nina Strohminger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Strohminger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Strohminger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Strohminger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Strohminger. Nina Strohminger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Melnikoff, David & Nina Strohminger. (2024). Bayesianism and wishful thinking are compatible. Nature Human Behaviour. 8(4). 692–701. 9 indexed citations

2.

Dranseika, Vilius, Shaun Nichols, & Nina Strohminger. (2023). Which kind of sameness? Disambiguating two senses of identity with a novel linguistic task. Cognition. 238. 105545–105545. 3 indexed citations

3.

Protzko, John, Kevin Tobia, Nina Strohminger, & Jonathan W. Schooler. (2023). Do Obligations Follow the Mind or Body?. Cognitive Science. 47(7). e13317–e13317.

4.

Strohminger, Nina & Matthew Jordan. (2022). Corporate insecthood. Cognition. 224. 105068–105068. 4 indexed citations

5.

Melnikoff, David & Nina Strohminger. (2020). The automatic influence of advocacy on lawyers and novices. Nature Human Behaviour. 4(12). 1258–1264. 22 indexed citations

6.

Nichols, Shaun, Nina Strohminger, Arun Rai, & Jay L. Garfield. (2018). Death and the Self. Cognitive Science. 42(S1). 314–332. 19 indexed citations

7.

Heiphetz, Larisa, Nina Strohminger, Susan A. Gelman, & Liane Young. (2018). Who am I? The role of moral beliefs in children's and adults' understanding of identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 78. 210–219. 33 indexed citations

8.

Strohminger, Nina, Joshua Knobe, & George E. Newman. (2017). The True Self: A Psychological Concept Distinct From the Self. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 12(4). 551–560. 208 indexed citations

9.

Galak, Jeff, et al.. (2016). Trickle-Down Preferences: Preferential Conformity to High Status Peers in Fashion Choices. PLoS ONE. 11(5). e0153448–e0153448. 13 indexed citations

10.

Strohminger, Nina, et al.. (2015). The MR2: A multi-racial, mega-resolution database of facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods. 48(3). 1197–1204. 76 indexed citations

11.

Garfield, Jay L., Shaun Nichols, Korhan Arun, & Nina Strohminger. (2015). Ego, Egoism and the Impact of Religion on Ethical Experience: What a Paradoxical Consequence of Buddhist Culture Tells Us About Moral Psychology. The Journal of Ethics. 19(3-4). 293–304. 10 indexed citations

12.

Strohminger, Nina & Shaun Nichols. (2015). Neurodegeneration and Identity. Psychological Science. 26(9). 1469–1479. 114 indexed citations

13.

Prinz, Jesse, et al.. (2015). Investigating the Moral Self.

14.

Gray, Kurt, et al.. (2014). The Science of Style: In Fashion, Colors Should Match Only Moderately. PLoS ONE. 9(7). e102772–e102772. 9 indexed citations

15.

Strohminger, Nina & Shaun Nichols. (2014). The essential moral self. Cognition. 131(1). 159–171. 337 indexed citations breakdown →

16.

Strohminger, Nina. (2014). The Meaning of Disgust: A Refutation. Emotion Review. 6(3). 214–216. 12 indexed citations

17.

Liao, Shen‐yi, Nina Strohminger, & Chandra Sripada. (2014). Empirically Investigating Imaginative Resistance. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 54(3). 339–355. 36 indexed citations

18.

Strohminger, Nina, Richard L. Lewis, & David E. Meyer. (2011). Divergent effects of different positive emotions on moral judgment. Cognition. 119(2). 295–300. 127 indexed citations

19.

Strohminger, Nina, et al.. (2010). Banishing the thought. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 33(2-3). 225–226. 6 indexed citations

20.

Potter, Mary C., Mark Nieuwenstein, & Nina Strohminger. (2008). Whole report versus partial report in RSVP sentences. Journal of Memory and Language. 58(4). 907–915. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact