Mary C. Potter
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 0.5%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Marvin M. ChunLinda LombardiJodi L. DavenportJudith F. KrollDaniel H. O’ConnorAdrian StaubBrad WybleNancy Kanwisher
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (28 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (22 papers)Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (15 papers)
- Cited by
- Cognitive NeuroscienceExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mary C. Potter
81 papers receiving 8.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
- Cognitive Neuroscience 7.4k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.4k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 2.1k
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1.2k
- Social Psychology 747
Countries citing papers authored by Mary C. Potter
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary C. Potter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary C. Potter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary C. Potter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary C. Potter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary C. Potter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary C. Potter. The network helps show where Mary C. Potter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary C. Potter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary C. Potter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary C. Potter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary C. Potter. Mary C. Potter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | Detecting meaning in RSVP at 13 ms per picture | 3 |
| 4 | 273 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 51 | |
| 7 | 82 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 95 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 84 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | 45 | |
| 18 | 189 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 111 |
About Mary C. Potter
Mary C. Potter is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 81 papers that have together received 9.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (28 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (22 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (7.4k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.4k citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (2.1k citations). Mary C. Potter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Marvin M. Chun, Linda Lombardi, Jodi L. Davenport, Judith F. Kroll, Daniel H. O’Connor, Adrian Staub, Brad Wyble, Nancy Kanwisher, Mark Nieuwenstein and Barbara Von Eckardt. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.