Nina Springer

3.0k citations
49 papers · 2.1k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 20

Impact in

    • Social Media and Politics
    • Media Studies and Communication
    • Legionella and Acanthamoeba research

Papers in

Nina Springer

43 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

‘You really have to have a thick skin’: A cross-cultural perspective on how online harassment influences female journalists 2018 · 207 citations
207201820262020202350100150200

Peers

Nina Springer
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Communication 420
  • Endocrinology 198
  • Ecology 722
  • Pollution 297
  • Environmental Chemistry 196
Replace C. Lee Campbell with:
C. Lee Campbell United States
Holly M. Bik United States
Aaron Becker United States
N. L. Wilson Australia
William A. Clark United States
Ping Xu China
N. McRoberts United States
Bashir Hussain Taiwan
Dov J. Stekel United Kingdom
Nina Springer relative to C. Lee Campbell United States C. Lee Campbell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.4×
C. Lee Campbell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Springer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Springer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Springer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Springer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Springer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Springer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Springer. The network helps show where Nina Springer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nina Springer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nina Springer Line = papers co-authored together Nina Springer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20251
3 20250
4 202319
5 20200
6 201738
7 2015151
8 201551
9
New Opportunities to Revive an Old Relationship: Reader-Newsroom-Interaction on Online News Sites
20131
10 20030
11 199811
12 199846
13 199656
14 199651
15 199558
16 19925
17 199238
18 1992165
19 1991285
20 198310

About Nina Springer

Nina Springer is a scholar working on Communication, Endocrinology, Parasitology, Ecology and Pollution, having authored 49 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (14 papers), Media Studies and Communication (12 papers), Social Media and Politics (10 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (9 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (6 papers), Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal (4 papers), Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (4 papers) and Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (420 citations), Endocrinology (198 citations), Ecology (722 citations), Pollution (297 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (196 citations). Nina Springer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Ludwig, Rudolf Amann, Karl‐Heinz Schleifer, Ines Engelmann, Karl Heinz Schleifer, Christian Baden, Bernhard Schink, Paromita Pain, Karl‐Heinz Schleifer and Gina Masullo Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Studies in Communication and Media, Digital Journalism, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and Journalism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026