Nina K. Rytwinski
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Norah C. FeenyEric A. YoungstromDavid M. FrescoMichael R. LiebowitzMeredith E. ColesMurray B. SteinStefan G. HofmannRichard G. Heimberg
- Topics
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (4 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers)Migration, Health and Trauma (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Nina K. Rytwinski
7 papers receiving 923 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Clinical Psychology 650
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 354
- Cognitive Neuroscience 146
- Social Psychology 137
- Epidemiology 86
Countries citing papers authored by Nina K. Rytwinski
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina K. Rytwinski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina K. Rytwinski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina K. Rytwinski more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina K. Rytwinski
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina K. Rytwinski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina K. Rytwinski. The network helps show where Nina K. Rytwinski may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina K. Rytwinski
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina K. Rytwinski. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina K. Rytwinski based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina K. Rytwinski. Nina K. Rytwinski is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 39 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | The Co‐Occurrence of Major Depressive Disorder Among Individuals With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Meta‐Analysisbreakdown → | 491 |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 334 | |
| 7 | 58 |
About Nina K. Rytwinski
Nina K. Rytwinski is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 947 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers) and Migration, Health and Trauma (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (650 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (354 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (81 citations). Nina K. Rytwinski has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Norah C. Feeny, Eric A. Youngstrom, David M. Fresco, Michael R. Liebowitz, Meredith E. Coles, Murray B. Stein, Stefan G. Hofmann, Richard G. Heimberg, Linda W. Craighead and Alexander C. Kline. Their work appears in journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Journal of Traumatic Stress and Depression and Anxiety.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.