Nina E. de Groot
Impact in
-
- MicroRNA in disease regulation
- Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
-
- Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Papers in
-
- RNA Research and Splicing 4
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 2
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 1
-
- Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling 2
- Co-authors
- Esther E. Creemers (6 shared papers)Ingeborg van der Made (6 shared papers)Yigal M. Pinto (5 shared papers)Maarten M.G. van den Hoogenhof (4 shared papers)Jolanda van der Velden (3 shared papers)Marie‐José Goumans (1 shared paper)Elza D. van Deel (1 shared paper)Anke J. Tijsen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (2 papers)Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology (1 paper)Cancer Cell International (1 paper)Biology Open (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nina E. de Groot
12 papers receiving 338 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Cancer Research 105
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 73
- Molecular Biology 206
- Oncology 50
- Aging 3
Countries citing papers authored by Nina E. de Groot
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina E. de Groot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina E. de Groot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina E. de Groot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina E. de Groot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina E. de Groot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina E. de Groot. The network helps show where Nina E. de Groot may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nina E. de Groot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 148 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 2 |
About Nina E. de Groot
Nina E. de Groot is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Oncology, Genetics and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include RNA Research and Splicing (4 papers), Digestive system and related health (2 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (2 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers), Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (2 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (105 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (73 citations), Molecular Biology (206 citations), Oncology (50 citations) and Aging (3 citations). Nina E. de Groot has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Esther E. Creemers, Ingeborg van der Made, Yigal M. Pinto, Maarten M.G. van den Hoogenhof, Jolanda van der Velden, Marie‐José Goumans, Elza D. van Deel, Anke J. Tijsen, Kees Fluiter and Wino J. Wijnen. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cancer Cell International, Biology Open and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.