Nils Carqueville
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Mathematical Physics top 10%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Algebra and Number Theory
- Co-authors
- Ingo RunkelMichael FlohrIlka BrunnerCatherine MeusburgerNiccolò CribioriDavid AndriotLóránt Szegedy
- Topics
- Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (15 papers)Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (7 papers)Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (7 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of High Energy PhysicsCommunications in Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in Mathematics
- Partner nations
- AustriaGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nils Carqueville
18 papers receiving 215 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Geometry and Topology 162
- Mathematical Physics 93
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 81
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 67
- Algebra and Number Theory 56
Countries citing papers authored by Nils Carqueville
This map shows the geographic impact of Nils Carqueville's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nils Carqueville with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nils Carqueville more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nils Carqueville
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nils Carqueville. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nils Carqueville. The network helps show where Nils Carqueville may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nils Carqueville
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nils Carqueville. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nils Carqueville based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nils Carqueville. Nils Carqueville is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 36 |
About Nils Carqueville
Nils Carqueville is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 18 papers that have together received 219 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (15 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (7 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (162 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (56 citations) and Mathematical Physics (93 citations). Nils Carqueville has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ingo Runkel, Michael Flohr, Ilka Brunner, Catherine Meusburger, Niccolò Cribiori, David Andriot and Lóránt Szegedy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of High Energy Physics, Communications in Mathematical Physics and Advances in Mathematics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.