Nilima Gulrajani
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Development top 0.5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Public Administration top 5%
- Safety Research top 10%
- Topics
- International Development and Aid (16 papers)Religion, Society, and Development (6 papers)Public Policy and Administration Research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Nilima Gulrajani
18 papers receiving 373 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Sociology and Political Science 217
- Development 214
- Political Science and International Relations 111
- Public Administration 95
- Safety Research 48
Countries citing papers authored by Nilima Gulrajani
This map shows the geographic impact of Nilima Gulrajani's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nilima Gulrajani with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nilima Gulrajani more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nilima Gulrajani
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nilima Gulrajani. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nilima Gulrajani. The network helps show where Nilima Gulrajani may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nilima Gulrajani
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nilima Gulrajani. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nilima Gulrajani based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nilima Gulrajani. Nilima Gulrajani is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | Understanding donor motivations: developing the Principled Aid Index | 6 |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | Why do countries become donors? Assessing the drivers and implications of donor proliferation | 4 |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 42 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | Topic Guide: Meeting the challenge: How can enterprise challenge funds be made to work better | 2 |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 81 | |
| 15 | 74 | |
| 16 | New vistas for development management: examining radical-reformist possibilities and potential Article (Submitted version) (Pre-refereed) | 0 |
| 17 | 37 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | Ringfencing aid may do more harm than good | 2 |
| 20 | 4 |
About Nilima Gulrajani
Nilima Gulrajani is a scholar working on Development, Public Administration and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 21 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Development and Aid (16 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (6 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (214 citations), Public Administration (95 citations) and Safety Research (48 citations). Nilima Gulrajani has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kim Moloney, Willy McCourt, Dan Honig, Liam Swiss, Sebastian Haug and Andy Sumner. Their work appears in journals such as World Development, Public Administration Review and Third World Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.