Peter O’Blenis

11 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers

Peter O’Blenis
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Health Informatics 42
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 83
  • Health Information Management 14
  • Information Systems and Management 20
  • Artificial Intelligence 92
Replace Daniel G. Hamilton with:
Daniel G. Hamilton Australia
Angelica Neisa Canada
Nicolas Fiorini United States
Anita Walden United States
Scott Askin Switzerland
Christophe Boudry France
Tian Kang United States
Jerry Sheehan United States
Babatunde Kazeem Olorisade United Kingdom
Hansi Zhang United States
Peter O’Blenis relative to Daniel G. Hamilton Australia Daniel G. Hamilton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Daniel G. Hamilton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter O’Blenis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter O’Blenis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter O’Blenis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter O’Blenis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter O’Blenis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter O’Blenis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter O’Blenis. The network helps show where Peter O’Blenis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter O’Blenis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter O’Blenis Line = papers co-authored together Peter O’Blenis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2020107
2 201071
3 201035
4 200623
5 200418
6 20108
7
Measuring the Quality of Breast Cancer Care in Women: Summary
20044
8 20192
9 20192
10 20202
11 20182

About Peter O’Blenis

Peter O’Blenis is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Oncology, Artificial Intelligence and Molecular Biology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 274 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (4 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (2 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (2 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (1 paper), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (1 paper) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (42 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (83 citations), Health Information Management (14 citations), Information Systems and Management (20 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (92 citations). Peter O’Blenis has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Diana Inkpen, Stan Matwin, Oana Frunza, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Tarek Nayfeh, M. Hassan Murad, Zhen Wang, William Klement, Li Zhang and Margaret Sampson. Their work appears in journals such as Value in Health, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, BMC Cancer and Value in Health Regional Issues.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact