Nikhil Panda
Impact in
- Emergency Medical Services top 5%
- Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Pharmacy top 10%
- Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Papers in
- Pharmacy 3
- Co-authors
- Alex B. HaynesStuart R. LipsitzMary BrindleIan SolskyDean M. DonahueMegan DelisleJason C. PradarelliSteven R. Lopushinsky
- Journals
- The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (5 papers)Annals of Surgery (4 papers)Journal of the American College of Surgeons (3 papers)British journal of surgery (2 papers)World Journal of Surgery (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nikhil Panda
41 papers receiving 549 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Emergency Medical Services 60
- Pharmacy 39
- Gender Studies 60
- Surgery 233
- Health Informatics 7
Countries citing papers authored by Nikhil Panda
This map shows the geographic impact of Nikhil Panda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nikhil Panda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nikhil Panda more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nikhil Panda
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nikhil Panda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nikhil Panda. The network helps show where Nikhil Panda may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nikhil Panda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 39 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 0 |
About Nikhil Panda
Nikhil Panda is a scholar working on Medical Laboratory Technology, Pharmacy, Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 44 papers that have together received 558 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (7 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (6 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (6 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (6 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (4 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (4 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (60 citations), Pharmacy (39 citations), Gender Studies (60 citations), Surgery (233 citations) and Health Informatics (7 citations). Nikhil Panda has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alex B. Haynes, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Mary Brindle, Ian Solsky, Dean M. Donahue, Megan Delisle, Jason C. Pradarelli, Steven R. Lopushinsky, Thomas K. Varghese and Denise W. Gee. Their work appears in journals such as The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Annals of Surgery, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, British journal of surgery and World Journal of Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.