Nigel S. Simpkins
- Organic Chemistry top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 2%
- Spectroscopy top 2%
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Alexander J. BlakePaul CoxDavid A. PriceBarry BunnVincent RodeschiniAdam D. HughesClaire WilsonN.K. Terrett
- Topics
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (65 papers)Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics (42 papers)Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (40 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyChemical Society ReviewsAngewandte Chemie International Edition
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Nigel S. Simpkins
162 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Organic Chemistry 3.6k
- Molecular Biology 818
- Inorganic Chemistry 501
- Spectroscopy 391
- Pharmacology 357
Countries citing papers authored by Nigel S. Simpkins
This map shows the geographic impact of Nigel S. Simpkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigel S. Simpkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigel S. Simpkins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nigel S. Simpkins
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigel S. Simpkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigel S. Simpkins. The network helps show where Nigel S. Simpkins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nigel S. Simpkins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nigel S. Simpkins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nigel S. Simpkins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nigel S. Simpkins. Nigel S. Simpkins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 26 | |
| 4 | 34 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 63 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 50 | |
| 13 | 40 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 70 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 100 modern reagents | 5 |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About Nigel S. Simpkins
Nigel S. Simpkins is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Toxicology and Spectroscopy, having authored 166 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (65 papers), Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics (42 papers) and Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (40 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (3.6k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (501 citations) and Toxicology (119 citations). Nigel S. Simpkins has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Alexander J. Blake, Paul Cox, David A. Price, Barry Bunn, Vincent Rodeschini, Adam D. Hughes, Claire Wilson, N.K. Terrett, Steven V. Ley and Alan J. Whittle. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chemical Society Reviews and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.