Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Afatinib versus gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: overall survival data from the phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial
2017398 citationsLuis Paz‐Ares, E.H. Tan et al.Annals of Oncologyprofile →
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy
1997394 citationsNigel Dodd, Jürgen Habermas et al.British Journal of Sociologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Nigel Dodd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigel Dodd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigel Dodd more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigel Dodd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigel Dodd. The network helps show where Nigel Dodd may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nigel Dodd
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nigel Dodd.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nigel Dodd based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nigel Dodd. Nigel Dodd is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dodd, Nigel, Michèle Lamont, & Mike Savage. (2017). Introduction to BJS special issue. British Journal of Sociology. 68(S1). S3–S10.18 indexed citations
Paz‐Ares, Luis, E.H. Tan, Kenneth J. O’Byrne, et al.. (2017). Afatinib versus gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: overall survival data from the phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial. Annals of Oncology. 28(2). 270–277.398 indexed citations breakdown →
Dodd, Nigel. (2014). The politics and social life of Bitcoin underline the significance of the new currency. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).1 indexed citations
Dodd, Nigel. (2001). The hidden side of the Euro. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).
14.
Dodd, Nigel. (2000). Convergence in Euroland. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).1 indexed citations
Dodd, Nigel. (1999). Social Theory and Modernity. Medical Entomology and Zoology.9 indexed citations
17.
Dodd, Nigel, Jürgen Habermas, & Stephen K. White. (1997). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. British Journal of Sociology. 48(2). 329–329.394 indexed citations breakdown →
Dodd, Nigel, et al.. (1971). Drama and Theatre in Education. Medical Entomology and Zoology.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.