Richard Hoefer
- Public Administration top 1%
- Social Work Education and Practice 22
- Public Policy and Administration Research 5
- Communication top 10%
-
- Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering 16
-
- Social Policy and Reform Studies 19
- Policy Transfer and Learning 5
-
- Political Influence and Corporate Strategies 7
-
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence 6
-
- Service-Learning and Community Engagement 5
Richard Hoefer
88 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Public Administration 282
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 43
- Cancer Research 156
- Communication 64
- Sociology and Political Science 364
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Hoefer
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Hoefer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Hoefer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Hoefer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Hoefer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Hoefer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Hoefer. The network helps show where Richard Hoefer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Hoefer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 229 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 7 | RAS pathway biomarkers for breast cancer prognosis. | 2016 | 12 |
| 8 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 61 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 35 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 22 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1996 | 22 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 13 | |
| 19 | 1993 | 18 | |
| 20 | Interest group effectiveness in social welfare policy making : the case of Sweden | 1989 | 1 |
About Richard Hoefer
Richard Hoefer is a scholar working on Public Administration, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Nuclear Energy and Engineering, Political Science and International Relations and Health, having authored 92 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Work Education and Practice (22 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (19 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (16 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (7 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (6 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (5 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (5 papers) and Service-Learning and Community Engagement (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (282 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (43 citations), Cancer Research (156 citations), Communication (64 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (364 citations). Richard Hoefer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Amy Tang, Harry D. Bear, Mary L. Guye, Vasilena Zheleva, Janet S. Winston, Jeffrey J. DuBois, David Chang, Rick J. Jansen, Larry Watson and Beverly M. Black. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social Work Education, Social Work, Administration in Social Work, Nonprofit Management and Leadership and Journal of Social Service Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.