This map shows the geographic impact of Nigel Bosch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigel Bosch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigel Bosch more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigel Bosch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigel Bosch. The network helps show where Nigel Bosch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nigel Bosch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nigel Bosch.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nigel Bosch based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nigel Bosch. Nigel Bosch is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hutt, Stephen, Jaclyn Ocumpaugh, Nigel Bosch, et al.. (2021). Who’s Stopping You? – Using Microanalysis to Explore the Impact of Science Anxiety on Self-Regulated Learning Operations. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 43(43).2 indexed citations
7.
Bosch, Nigel, et al.. (2020). Using Association Rule Mining to Uncover Rarely Occurring Relationships in Two University Online STEM Courses: A Comparative Analysis.. Grantee Submission.1 indexed citations
8.
Anderson, Carolyn Jane, et al.. (2020). Online discussion forum help-seeking behaviors of students underrepresented in STEM. International Conference of Learning Sciences. 809–810.1 indexed citations
9.
Bosch, Nigel, et al.. (2020). Feature Selection Metrics: Similarities, Differences, and Characteristics of the Selected Models.. Educational Data Mining.6 indexed citations
10.
Bosch, Nigel, et al.. (2020). Harbingers of Collaboration? The Role of Early-Class Behaviors in Predicting Collaborative Problem Solving.. Educational Data Mining.1 indexed citations
11.
Bosch, Nigel, et al.. (2020). "Hello, [REDACTED]": Protecting Student Privacy in Analyses of Online Discussion Forums.. Grantee Submission.4 indexed citations
12.
Bosch, Nigel, et al.. (2019). I'm Sure! Automatic Detection of Metacognition in Online Course Discussion Forums.. Grantee Submission.1 indexed citations
13.
Paquette, Luc, et al.. (2018). Matching data-driven models of group interactions to video analysis of collaborative problem solving on tablet computers. International Conference of Learning Sciences. 1. 312–319.5 indexed citations
14.
D’Mello, Sidney K., Caitlin Mills, Robert Bixler, & Nigel Bosch. (2017). Zone out no more: Mitigating mind wandering during computerized reading. Educational Data Mining.23 indexed citations
15.
Stewart, Angela, Nigel Bosch, & Sidney K. D’Mello. (2017). Generalizability of Face-Based Mind Wandering Detection across Task Contexts.. Educational Data Mining.11 indexed citations
16.
Bosch, Nigel, Sidney K. D’Mello, Ryan S. Baker, et al.. (2016). Detecting student emotions in computer-enabled classrooms. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 4125–4129.35 indexed citations
17.
Bosch, Nigel, et al.. (2016). Student Emotion, Co-Occurrence, and Dropout in a MOOC Context.. Educational Data Mining. 353–357.29 indexed citations
Bosch, Nigel, et al.. (2015). Video-Based Affect Detection in Noninteractive Learning Environments.. Educational Data Mining. 440–443.4 indexed citations
20.
Bosch, Nigel & Sidney K. D’Mello. (2013). Sequential patterns of affective states of novice programmers. 1009. 1–10.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.