Nicolas Dauman

627 citations
20 papers · 427 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Nicolas Dauman

17 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers

Nicolas Dauman
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Sensory Systems 298
  • Speech and Hearing 120
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 315
  • Neurology 125
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 52
Replace Hideyuki Saito with:
Hideyuki Saito Japan
Veronica Kennedy United Kingdom
Camila Maia Rabelo Brazil
Benjamin Boecking Germany
Gunilla Zachau Sweden
Petra Brüeggemann Germany
Katharine Brewster United States
Gerhard Goebel Germany
Simon Jakes United Kingdom
Emily J. Thielman United States
Nicolas Dauman relative to Hideyuki Saito Japan Hideyuki Saito's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Hideyuki Saito · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicolas Dauman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicolas Dauman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicolas Dauman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicolas Dauman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicolas Dauman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicolas Dauman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicolas Dauman. The network helps show where Nicolas Dauman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Nicolas Dauman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicolas Dauman Line = papers co-authored together Nicolas Dauman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2014223
2 201490
3 201721
4 201220
5 201415
6 201912
7 20159
8 20208
9 20238
10 20207
11
Habituation theories in current models of chronic tinnitus: evidence and criticism
20134
12 20223
13 20102
14 20122
15 20231
16
The experience of tinnitus and its Interaction with unique life histories
20141
17 20131
18 20250
19 20140
20 20090

About Nicolas Dauman

Nicolas Dauman is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Neurology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (11 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (5 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (5 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (4 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (298 citations), Speech and Hearing (120 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (315 citations), Neurology (125 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (52 citations). Nicolas Dauman has collaborated with scholars based in France, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Andersson, Martin Pienkowski, Brian C. J. Moore, Soly Erlandsson, Claudia Coelho, Richard S. Tyler, Hyung Jin Jun, Anthony T. Cacace, R Dauman and Dolores Albarracín. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, American Journal of Audiology, International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, Ear and Hearing and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact