Benjamin Boecking

945 total citations
49 papers, 565 citations indexed

About

Benjamin Boecking is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Benjamin Boecking has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 565 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Sensory Systems, 30 papers in Neurology and 24 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Benjamin Boecking's work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (37 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (30 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (23 papers). Benjamin Boecking is often cited by papers focused on Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (37 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (30 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (23 papers). Benjamin Boecking collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Benjamin Boecking's co-authors include Birgit Mazurek, Petra Brüeggemann, Matthias Rose, Myra Spiliopoulou, Uli Niemann, Nyamaa Amarjargal, Christian Rauschenberg, Anita Schick, Patrick Neff and Isabell Paetzold and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Psychological Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Benjamin Boecking

43 papers receiving 560 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Benjamin Boecking Germany 16 369 289 267 91 80 49 565
Henning Teismann Germany 12 245 0.7× 285 1.0× 140 0.5× 176 1.9× 58 0.7× 29 573
Simon Jakes United Kingdom 14 636 1.7× 586 2.0× 425 1.6× 99 1.1× 121 1.5× 22 891
Birgit Kroener-Herwig Germany 11 87 0.2× 142 0.5× 44 0.2× 39 0.4× 92 1.1× 14 402
Wing Ting To United States 15 128 0.3× 261 0.9× 296 1.1× 44 0.5× 58 0.7× 20 514
Maren Struve Germany 7 112 0.3× 171 0.6× 74 0.3× 75 0.8× 67 0.8× 8 285
Johanna C. Goll United Kingdom 12 121 0.3× 569 2.0× 61 0.2× 151 1.7× 31 0.4× 13 835
Jane Baker United Kingdom 10 42 0.1× 213 0.7× 21 0.1× 94 1.0× 94 1.2× 13 378
Lee Bartel Canada 12 27 0.1× 261 0.9× 24 0.1× 41 0.5× 31 0.4× 48 528
Cassandra Gould van Praag United Kingdom 14 28 0.1× 274 0.9× 25 0.1× 189 2.1× 102 1.3× 25 576
Benjamin Clemens Germany 15 21 0.1× 307 1.1× 87 0.3× 158 1.7× 109 1.4× 31 527

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Boecking

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Boecking's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Boecking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Boecking more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Boecking

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Boecking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Boecking. The network helps show where Benjamin Boecking may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin Boecking

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin Boecking. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin Boecking based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin Boecking. Benjamin Boecking is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rauschenberg, Christian, Benjamin Boecking, Thérèse van Amelsvoort, et al.. (2024). A control theoretic approach to evaluate and inform ecological momentary interventions. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 33(4). e70001–e70001. 1 indexed citations
2.
3.
Boecking, Benjamin, S. Klasing, Petra Brüeggemann, Matthias Rose, & Birgit Mazurek. (2024). Lipid parameters and depression in patients with chronic tinnitus: A cross-sectional observation. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 179. 111613–111613. 1 indexed citations
4.
Boecking, Benjamin, et al.. (2024). Emotional self-states and coping responses in patients with chronic tinnitus: a schema mode model approach. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 15. 1257299–1257299. 3 indexed citations
5.
Reininghaus, Ulrich, Isabell Paetzold, Christian Rauschenberg, et al.. (2023). Effects of a Novel, Transdiagnostic Ecological Momentary Intervention for Prevention, and Early Intervention of Severe Mental Disorder in Youth (EMIcompass): Findings From an Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 49(3). 592–604. 19 indexed citations
7.
Bulla, Jan, Petra Brüeggemann, S. Klasing, et al.. (2023). Limited Link of Common Blood Parameters with Tinnitus. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 12(11). 3814–3814. 1 indexed citations
9.
Rauschenberg, Christian, Benjamin Boecking, Isabell Paetzold, et al.. (2021). A Compassion-Focused Ecological Momentary Intervention for Enhancing Resilience in Help-Seeking Youth: Uncontrolled Pilot Study. JMIR Mental Health. 8(8). e25650–e25650. 26 indexed citations
10.
Peter, Nicole, et al.. (2021). Deutschsprachige Versionen des Tinnitus Functional Index. HNO. 70(3). 187–192. 5 indexed citations
11.
Boecking, Benjamin, Matthias Rose, Petra Brüeggemann, & Birgit Mazurek. (2021). Two birds with one stone.–Addressing depressive symptoms, emotional tension and worry improves tinnitus-related distress and affective pain perceptions in patients with chronic tinnitus. PLoS ONE. 16(3). e0246747–e0246747. 12 indexed citations
12.
Niemann, Uli, Petra Brüeggemann, Benjamin Boecking, Birgit Mazurek, & Myra Spiliopoulou. (2020). Development and internal validation of a depression severity prediction model for tinnitus patients based on questionnaire responses and socio-demographics. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 4664–4664. 11 indexed citations
13.
Boecking, Benjamin, et al.. (2020). Tinnitus-related distress and pain perceptions in patients with chronic tinnitus – Do psychological factors constitute a link?. PLoS ONE. 15(6). e0234807–e0234807. 27 indexed citations
14.
Niemann, Uli, et al.. (2020). Tinnitus-related distress after multimodal treatment can be characterized using a key subset of baseline variables. PLoS ONE. 15(1). e0228037–e0228037. 15 indexed citations
15.
Boecking, Benjamin, Petra Brüeggemann, Nancy L. Pedersen, et al.. (2020). Gender-Specific Risk Factors and Comorbidities of Bothersome Tinnitus. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 14. 706–706. 36 indexed citations
16.
Niemann, Uli, Benjamin Boecking, Petra Brüeggemann, Birgit Mazurek, & Myra Spiliopoulou. (2020). Gender-Specific Differences in Patients With Chronic Tinnitus—Baseline Characteristics and Treatment Effects. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 14. 487–487. 25 indexed citations
17.
Boecking, Benjamin, et al.. (2020). Personality Traits, Perceived Stress, and Tinnitus-Related Distress in Patients With Chronic Tinnitus: Support for a Vulnerability-Stress Model. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 3093–3093. 31 indexed citations
18.
Brüeggemann, Petra, C. Seydel, Agnieszka J. Szczepek, et al.. (2019). ICD-10 Symptom Rating questionnaire for assessment of psychological comorbidities in patients with chronic tinnitus. HNO. 67(S2). 46–50. 6 indexed citations
19.
Mazurek, Birgit, Benjamin Boecking, & Petra Brüeggemann. (2019). Association Between Stress and Tinnitus—New Aspects. Otology & Neurotology. 40(4). e467–e473. 51 indexed citations
20.
Boecking, Benjamin, Petra Brüeggemann, & Birgit Mazurek. (2019). Tinnitus: psychosomatische Aspekte. HNO. 67(2). 137–152. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026