Nicolaas Prins
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 23
- Neural dynamics and brain function 8
- Aesthetic Perception and Analysis 5
- Sensory Systems top 10%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Color perception and design 2
-
- Color Science and Applications 8
-
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods 4
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 3
-
- Advanced Statistical Methods and Models 2
- Co-authors
- Frederick A. A. KingdomAlexander J. MussapAnthony HayesCurtis L. BakerAaron JohnsonMichael K. TourtellotMichael D. GreenfieldWilliam J. Bell
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Nicolaas Prins
26 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Cognitive Neuroscience 947
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 204
- Sensory Systems 53
- Human-Computer Interaction 59
- Social Psychology 185
Countries citing papers authored by Nicolaas Prins
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicolaas Prins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicolaas Prins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicolaas Prins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicolaas Prins
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicolaas Prins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicolaas Prins. The network helps show where Nicolaas Prins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Nicolaas Prins, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 3 | Applying the Model-Comparison Approach to Test Specific Research Hypotheses in Psychophysical Research Using the Palamedes Toolboxbreakdown → | 2018 | 269 |
| 4 | 2013 | 75 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 69 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 22 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 41 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 18 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 15 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2000 | 9 |
About Nicolaas Prins
Nicolaas Prins is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (23 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers), Color Science and Applications (8 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (5 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (4 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (2 papers) and Color perception and design (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (947 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (204 citations) and Sensory Systems (53 citations). Nicolaas Prins has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Frederick A. A. Kingdom, Alexander J. Mussap, Anthony Hayes, Curtis L. Baker, Aaron Johnson, Michael K. Tourtellot, Michael D. Greenfield, William J. Bell, James F. Juola and Serge O. Dumoulin. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, Frontiers in Psychology and Neuroreport.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.