Edwin S. Wong

2.2k citations
127 papers · 1.5k indexed · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Edwin S. Wong

117 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Edwin S. Wong
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Family Practice 81
  • General Health Professions 896
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 79
  • Research and Theory 17
  • Economics and Econometrics 442
Replace Tobias Freund with:
Tobias Freund Germany
Denise D. Quigley United States
Thomas Blakeman United Kingdom
Marie-Ève Poitras Canada
Samuel T. Edwards United States
Kedar S. Mate United States
Winston Liaw United States
Fred Burge Canada
Pierre Chopard Switzerland
Patricia S. Keenan United States
Edwin S. Wong relative to Tobias Freund Germany Tobias Freund's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Tobias Freund · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin S. Wong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin S. Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin S. Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin S. Wong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin S. Wong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin S. Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin S. Wong. The network helps show where Edwin S. Wong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edwin S. Wong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin S. Wong Line = papers co-authored together Edwin S. Wong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20252
3 20240
4 20241
5 20241
6 20240
7 20231
8 20233
9 20234
10 20232
11 20237
12 202312
13 20233
14 20233
15 20202
16 20204
17 20182
18
Association between length of stay and readmission for COPD.
201727
19
Organizational structure for chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
20165
20
Survey nonresponders incurred higher medical utilization and lower medication adherence.
20157

About Edwin S. Wong

Edwin S. Wong is a scholar working on Family Practice, General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Economics and Econometrics and Health, having authored 127 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (52 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (45 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (20 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (17 papers), Global Health Care Issues (15 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (11 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (9 papers) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (81 citations), General Health Professions (896 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (79 citations), Research and Theory (17 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (442 citations). Edwin S. Wong has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul L. Hebert, Stephan D. Fihn, Chuan‐Fen Liu, Karin M. Nelson, Chuan‐Fen Liu, Susan E. Hernandez, Matthew L. Maciejewski, Ashok Reddy, Seppo T. Rinne and Rafael Alfonso‐Cristancho. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of General Internal Medicine, Medical Care, JAMA Network Open, Health Services Research and Healthcare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026