Nicola Binetti

609 total citations
27 papers, 282 citations indexed

About

Nicola Binetti is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicola Binetti has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 282 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 13 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 7 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Nicola Binetti's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (9 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (8 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (6 papers). Nicola Binetti is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (9 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (8 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (6 papers). Nicola Binetti collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and France. Nicola Binetti's co-authors include Isabelle Mareschal, Simon Julier, Fabrizio Doricchi, Charlotte Harrison, Alan Johnston, Francesca Lecce, Antoine Coutrot, Duncan P. Brumby, Anthony Steed and Luyan Wu and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Nicola Binetti

25 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nicola Binetti United Kingdom 11 163 74 68 60 55 27 282
Christoph Strauch Netherlands 11 272 1.7× 73 1.0× 60 0.9× 124 2.1× 29 0.5× 45 443
Elle van Heusden Netherlands 6 258 1.6× 86 1.2× 42 0.6× 80 1.3× 24 0.4× 11 363
Chie Nakatani Japan 13 314 1.9× 109 1.5× 34 0.5× 52 0.9× 34 0.6× 30 396
Alejandro J. Estudillo United Kingdom 11 221 1.4× 131 1.8× 21 0.3× 42 0.7× 112 2.0× 29 269
Michiel H.G. Claessen Netherlands 11 113 0.7× 70 0.9× 48 0.7× 39 0.7× 49 0.9× 17 336
Sven‐Thomas Graupner Germany 9 206 1.3× 92 1.2× 79 1.2× 85 1.4× 42 0.8× 16 327
Simona Buetti United States 15 458 2.8× 144 1.9× 35 0.5× 102 1.7× 106 1.9× 48 539
Sabine Born Switzerland 12 337 2.1× 65 0.9× 24 0.4× 21 0.3× 33 0.6× 32 366
Manuel Blanco Spain 9 589 3.6× 162 2.2× 46 0.7× 96 1.6× 49 0.9× 24 669
Lisa N. Jefferies Canada 11 327 2.0× 116 1.6× 13 0.2× 90 1.5× 45 0.8× 22 411

Countries citing papers authored by Nicola Binetti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicola Binetti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicola Binetti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicola Binetti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicola Binetti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicola Binetti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicola Binetti. The network helps show where Nicola Binetti may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicola Binetti

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicola Binetti. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicola Binetti based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicola Binetti. Nicola Binetti is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Binetti, Nicola, et al.. (2024). Expression perceptive fields explain individual differences in the recognition of facial emotions. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(1). 62–62.
2.
Pinto, Mário, et al.. (2024). The time course of the spatial representation of ‘past’ and ‘future’ concepts: New evidence from the STEARC effect. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 86(3). 1048–1055.
3.
Binetti, Nicola, Christina Carlisi, Vinay P. Namboodiri, et al.. (2023). Genetic algorithms reveal identity independent representation of emotional expressions.. Emotion. 24(2). 495–505. 1 indexed citations
4.
Pinto, Mário, et al.. (2023). Space is a late heuristic of elapsing time: New evidence from the STEARC effect. Cortex. 164. 21–32. 5 indexed citations
5.
Binetti, Nicola, et al.. (2022). Genetic algorithms reveal profound individual differences in emotion recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119(45). e2201380119–e2201380119. 16 indexed citations
6.
Luft, Caroline Di Bernardi, Ιωάννα Ζιώγα, Anastasios Giannopoulos, et al.. (2022). Social synchronization of brain activity increases during eye-contact. Communications Biology. 5(1). 412–412. 23 indexed citations
7.
Lisi, Matteo, et al.. (2022). War-related trauma linked to increased sustained attention to threat in children. Child Development. 93(4). 900–909. 19 indexed citations
8.
Binetti, Nicola, et al.. (2021). Using visual and auditory cues to locate out-of-view objects in head-mounted augmented reality. Displays. 69. 102032–102032. 28 indexed citations
9.
Julier, Simon, et al.. (2020). Directing versus Attracting Attention: Exploring the Effectiveness of Central and Peripheral Cues in Panoramic Videos. Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich). 63–72. 24 indexed citations
10.
Binetti, Nicola, et al.. (2019). Assumptions about the positioning of virtual stimuli affect gaze direction estimates during Augmented Reality based interactions. Scientific Reports. 9(1). 2566–2566. 7 indexed citations
11.
Harrison, Charlotte, Nicola Binetti, Isabelle Mareschal, & Alan Johnston. (2018). Selective binding of facial features reveals dynamic expression fragments. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 9031–9031. 2 indexed citations
12.
Binetti, Nicola, Charlotte Harrison, Isabelle Mareschal, & Alan Johnston. (2017). Pupil response hazard rates predict perceived gaze durations. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 3969–3969. 3 indexed citations
13.
Binetti, Nicola, Charlotte Harrison, Isabelle Mareschal, & Alan Johnston. (2017). Temporal Order Judgements of Dynamic Gaze Stimuli Reveal a Postdictive Prioritisation of Averted Over Direct Shifts. i-Perception. 8(4). 978992360–978992360. 3 indexed citations
14.
Harrison, Charlotte, Nicola Binetti, Isabelle Mareschal, & Alan Johnston. (2017). Time-Order Errors in Duration Judgment Are Independent of Spatial Positioning. Frontiers in Psychology. 8. 340–340. 3 indexed citations
15.
Harrison, Charlotte, Nicola Binetti, Antoine Coutrot, Isabelle Mareschal, & Alan Johnston. (2015). Individual differences in preference for mutual gaze duration.. Journal of Vision. 15(12). 173–173. 2 indexed citations
16.
Binetti, Nicola, et al.. (2014). The Effect of Self-Efficacy on Visual Discrimination Sensitivity. PLoS ONE. 9(10). e109392–e109392. 16 indexed citations
17.
Binetti, Nicola, Isabelle A. Siegler, Domenica Bueti, & Fabrizio Doricchi. (2012). Adaptive tuning of perceptual timing to whole body motion. Neuropsychologia. 51(2). 197–210. 10 indexed citations
18.
Binetti, Nicola, Francesca Lecce, & Fabrizio Doricchi. (2012). Time-dilation and time-contraction in an anisochronous and anisometric visual scenery. Journal of Vision. 12(7). 8–8. 27 indexed citations
20.
Binetti, Nicola, Isabelle A. Siegler, Domenica Bueti, & Fabrizio Doricchi. (2010). Time in motion: Effects of whole-body rotatory accelerations on timekeeping processes. Neuropsychologia. 48(6). 1842–1852. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026