Chie Nakatani

594 total citations
30 papers, 396 citations indexed

About

Chie Nakatani is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Chie Nakatani has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 396 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Chie Nakatani's work include Neural dynamics and brain function (12 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (10 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (9 papers). Chie Nakatani is often cited by papers focused on Neural dynamics and brain function (12 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (10 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (9 papers). Chie Nakatani collaborates with scholars based in Japan, Belgium and Germany. Chie Nakatani's co-authors include Cees van Leeuwen, Andrey R. Nikolaev, Gijs Plomp, Marta Olivetti Belardinelli, Massimiliano Palmiero, Alexander Pollatsek, Junji Ito, Peter Jurica, Antonino Raffone and Shruti Baijal and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and Psychological Review.

In The Last Decade

Chie Nakatani

30 papers receiving 379 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chie Nakatani Japan 13 314 109 52 34 34 30 396
Rosanne L. Rademaker United States 11 662 2.1× 144 1.3× 90 1.7× 33 1.0× 24 0.7× 17 728
Tom Campbell Finland 11 357 1.1× 109 1.0× 37 0.7× 9 0.3× 19 0.6× 32 433
Fabiano Botta Spain 11 421 1.3× 166 1.5× 60 1.2× 29 0.9× 14 0.4× 35 526
Hongsup Shin United States 4 440 1.4× 95 0.9× 74 1.4× 23 0.7× 13 0.4× 6 473
Shigeru Ichihara Japan 9 283 0.9× 201 1.8× 78 1.5× 22 0.6× 51 1.5× 21 376
Michał Kuniecki Poland 10 239 0.8× 91 0.8× 97 1.9× 14 0.4× 23 0.7× 25 354
Nadine Dijkstra United Kingdom 11 729 2.3× 163 1.5× 108 2.1× 48 1.4× 16 0.5× 21 862
Joseph L. Brooks United Kingdom 11 413 1.3× 94 0.9× 68 1.3× 65 1.9× 17 0.5× 26 529
Anthony Stigliani United States 11 578 1.8× 91 0.8× 67 1.3× 99 2.9× 9 0.3× 16 643
Robert A. Lavine United States 6 140 0.4× 45 0.4× 49 0.9× 14 0.4× 55 1.6× 14 268

Countries citing papers authored by Chie Nakatani

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chie Nakatani's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chie Nakatani with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chie Nakatani more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chie Nakatani

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chie Nakatani. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chie Nakatani. The network helps show where Chie Nakatani may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chie Nakatani

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chie Nakatani. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chie Nakatani based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chie Nakatani. Chie Nakatani is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nakatani, Chie, et al.. (2024). Prior EEG marks focused and mind-wandering mental states across trials. Cerebral Cortex. 34(10). 1 indexed citations
2.
Beeck, Hans Op de & Chie Nakatani. (2019). Introduction to Human Neuroimaging. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations
3.
Nakatani, Chie, et al.. (2019). Long-term dynamics of mind wandering: ultradian rhythms in thought generation. Neuroscience of Consciousness. 2019(1). niz007–niz007. 7 indexed citations
4.
Leeuwen, Cees van, et al.. (2017). A neural mass model of cross frequency coupling. PLoS ONE. 12(4). e0173776–e0173776. 13 indexed citations
5.
Palmiero, Massimiliano, Chie Nakatani, & Cees van Leeuwen. (2017). Visual Creativity Across Cultures: A Comparison Between Italians and Japanese. Creativity Research Journal. 29(1). 86–90. 4 indexed citations
6.
Nakatani, Chie, et al.. (2017). Analysis of an Interneuron Gamma Mechanism for Cross-Frequency Coupling. Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena. 12(4). 53–73. 1 indexed citations
7.
Nakatani, Chie, et al.. (2016). A neural mass model of phase–amplitude coupling. Biological Cybernetics. 110(2-3). 171–192. 12 indexed citations
8.
Nikolaev, Andrey R., Peter Jurica, Chie Nakatani, Gijs Plomp, & Cees van Leeuwen. (2013). Visual encoding and fixation target selection in free viewing: presaccadic brain potentials. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 7. 26–26. 25 indexed citations
9.
Nakatani, Chie, et al.. (2013). Cross-frequency phase synchrony around the saccade period as a correlate of perceiver's internal state. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 7. 18–18. 4 indexed citations
10.
Simione, Luca, Antonino Raffone, Gezinus Wolters, et al.. (2012). ViSA: A neurodynamic model for visuo-spatial working memory, attentional blink, and conscious access.. Psychological Review. 119(4). 745–769. 24 indexed citations
11.
Baijal, Shruti, Chie Nakatani, Cees van Leeuwen, & Narayanan Srinivasan. (2012). Processing statistics: An examination of focused and distributed attention using event related potentials. Vision Research. 85. 20–25. 15 indexed citations
12.
Leeuwen, Cees van, et al.. (2011). Gestalt has no notion of attention. But does it need one. Lirias (KU Leuven). 2011(17). 35–68. 6 indexed citations
13.
Nikolaev, Andrey R., Chie Nakatani, Gijs Plomp, Peter Jurica, & Cees van Leeuwen. (2011). Eye fixation-related potentials in free viewing identify encoding failures in change detection. NeuroImage. 56(3). 1598–1607. 35 indexed citations
14.
Perea, Manuel, Chie Nakatani, & Cees van Leeuwen. (2010). Transposition effects in reading Japanese Kana: Are they orthographic in nature?. Memory & Cognition. 39(4). 700–707. 16 indexed citations
15.
Nakatani, Chie, Shruti Baijal, & Cees van Leeuwen. (2009). Practice begets the second target: task repetition and the attentional blink effect. Progress in brain research. 176. 123–134. 4 indexed citations
16.
Nakatani, Chie, Shruti Baijal, & Cees van Leeuwen. (2009). Practice effect in Attentional Blink: an ERP study. Neuroscience Research. 65. S41–S41. 2 indexed citations
17.
Nakatani, Chie & Cees van Leeuwen. (2008). A pragmatic approach to multi-modality and non-normality in fixation duration studies of cognitive processes. Journal of Eye Movement Research. 1(2). 12 indexed citations
18.
Nakatani, Chie & Alexander Pollatsek. (2004). An eye movement analysis of “mental rotation” of simple scenes. Perception & Psychophysics. 66(7). 1227–1245. 13 indexed citations
19.
Ito, Junji, Andrey R. Nikolaev, Marjolein Luman, et al.. (2003). Perceptual Switching, Eye Movements, and the Bus Paradox. Perception. 32(6). 681–698. 35 indexed citations
20.
Nakatani, Chie, et al.. (1993). Menstrual cycle effects on a VDT–based simulation task: cognitive indices and subjective ratings. Ergonomics. 36(4). 331–339. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026