Sabine Born

470 total citations
32 papers, 366 citations indexed

About

Sabine Born is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, Sabine Born has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 366 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 10 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 5 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in Sabine Born's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (25 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (23 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (10 papers). Sabine Born is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (25 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (23 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (10 papers). Sabine Born collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, France and Austria. Sabine Born's co-authors include Dirk Kerzel, Jan Theeuwes, Patrick Cavanagh, David Souto, Eckart Zimmermann, Ulrich Ansorge, Gereon R. Fink, Jay Pratt, Rosanne M. van Diepen and Nicolas Burra and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Neurophysiology.

In The Last Decade

Sabine Born

31 papers receiving 363 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sabine Born Switzerland 12 337 65 33 26 24 32 366
Lisandro Kaunitz Italy 9 270 0.8× 45 0.7× 33 1.0× 18 0.7× 27 1.1× 10 291
Christian Wolf Germany 8 223 0.7× 64 1.0× 23 0.7× 26 1.0× 19 0.8× 24 258
Michael Niedeggen Germany 14 438 1.3× 88 1.4× 22 0.7× 22 0.8× 5 0.2× 25 467
Manon Mulckhuyse Netherlands 12 512 1.5× 118 1.8× 50 1.5× 73 2.8× 34 1.4× 18 569
Lotje van der Linden France 6 263 0.8× 49 0.8× 13 0.4× 51 2.0× 49 2.0× 8 304
Katrin Herrmann United States 4 387 1.1× 105 1.6× 31 0.9× 32 1.2× 6 0.3× 6 457
Gerrit W. Maus United States 12 384 1.1× 85 1.3× 34 1.0× 51 2.0× 44 1.8× 27 451
Lukasz Grzeczkowski Switzerland 10 281 0.8× 78 1.2× 16 0.5× 12 0.5× 7 0.3× 22 335
Shui-I Shih United Kingdom 8 291 0.9× 87 1.3× 48 1.5× 20 0.8× 14 0.6× 12 319
Pia Ley Germany 9 263 0.8× 142 2.2× 11 0.3× 21 0.8× 8 0.3× 13 318

Countries citing papers authored by Sabine Born

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sabine Born's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sabine Born with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sabine Born more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sabine Born

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sabine Born. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sabine Born. The network helps show where Sabine Born may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sabine Born

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sabine Born. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sabine Born based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sabine Born. Sabine Born is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rommel, Alexander, Anne Starker, Franziska Prütz, et al.. (2022). Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study – objectives, procedure and experiences. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(2). 48–65. 12 indexed citations
2.
Born, Sabine, et al.. (2020). Attribute amnesia can be modulated by foveal presentation and the pre-allocation of endogenous spatial attention. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 82(5). 2302–2314. 8 indexed citations
3.
Born, Sabine, et al.. (2020). Microsaccade dynamics in the attentional repulsion effect. Vision Research. 170. 46–52. 5 indexed citations
4.
Born, Sabine. (2019). Saccadic Suppression of Displacement Does Not Reflect a Saccade-Specific Bias to Assume Stability. Vision. 3(4). 49–49. 5 indexed citations
5.
Born, Sabine, et al.. (2019). Saccadic selection does not eliminate attribute amnesia.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 45(12). 2165–2173. 9 indexed citations
6.
Souto, David, Sabine Born, & Dirk Kerzel. (2018). The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 80(5). 1182–1192. 4 indexed citations
7.
Born, Sabine, et al.. (2016). Compression of Space for Low Visibility Probes. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 10. 21–21. 8 indexed citations
8.
Born, Sabine, Eckart Zimmermann, & Patrick Cavanagh. (2015). The spatial profile of mask-induced compression for perception and action. Vision Research. 110(Pt A). 128–141. 5 indexed citations
9.
Born, Sabine, Dirk Kerzel, & Jay Pratt. (2015). Contingent capture effects in temporal order judgments.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 41(4). 995–1006. 8 indexed citations
10.
Born, Sabine, et al.. (2014). Presaccadic perceptual facilitation effects depend on saccade execution: Evidence from the stop-signal paradigm. Journal of Vision. 14(3). 7–7. 34 indexed citations
11.
Fischmeister, Florian Ph. S., et al.. (2014). Attentional Capture and Inhibition of Saccades after Irrelevant and Relevant Cues. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2014. 1–12. 4 indexed citations
12.
Born, Sabine, Ulrich Ansorge, & Dirk Kerzel. (2013). Predictability of spatial and non-spatial target properties improves perception in the pre-saccadic interval. Vision Research. 91. 93–101. 17 indexed citations
13.
Kerzel, Dirk, et al.. (2012). Perceptual grouping allows for attention to cover noncontiguous locations and suppress capture from nearby locations.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 38(6). 1362–1370. 14 indexed citations
14.
Born, Sabine & Dirk Kerzel. (2011). Effects of stimulus contrast and temporal delays in saccadic distraction. Vision Research. 51(10). 1163–1172. 4 indexed citations
15.
Kerzel, Dirk, et al.. (2011). Saliency Changes Appearance. PLoS ONE. 6(12). e28292–e28292. 9 indexed citations
16.
Born, Sabine & Dirk Kerzel. (2011). Time-course of feature-based top-down control in saccadic distractor effects.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 37(6). 1689–1699. 5 indexed citations
17.
Born, Sabine, Dirk Kerzel, & Jan Theeuwes. (2010). Evidence for a dissociation between the control of oculomotor capture and disengagement. Experimental Brain Research. 208(4). 621–631. 48 indexed citations
18.
Born, Sabine & Dirk Kerzel. (2009). Congruency effects in the remote distractor paradigm: Evidence for top-down modulation. Journal of Vision. 9(9). 3–3. 12 indexed citations
19.
Kerzel, Dirk, Sabine Born, & David Souto. (2009). Smooth pursuit eye movements and perception share target selection, but only some central resources. Behavioural Brain Research. 201(1). 66–73. 14 indexed citations
20.
Born, Sabine & Dirk Kerzel. (2008). Influence of target and distractor contrast on the remote distractor effect. Vision Research. 48(28). 2805–2816. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026