Christoph Strauch

853 total citations · 1 hit paper
45 papers, 443 citations indexed

About

Christoph Strauch is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Christoph Strauch has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 443 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 10 papers in Human-Computer Interaction and 8 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Christoph Strauch's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (23 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (22 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (10 papers). Christoph Strauch is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (23 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (22 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (10 papers). Christoph Strauch collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom. Christoph Strauch's co-authors include Anke Huckauf, Stefan Van der Stigchel, Marnix Naber, Chin‐An Wang, Wolfgang Einhäuser, Kristin Mühl, Martin Baumann, Robert Schnuerch, Stefan Pfattheicher and Katarzyna Patro and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Trends in Neurosciences and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Christoph Strauch

40 papers receiving 434 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Pupillometry as an integrated readout of distinct attentional networks

2022 114 citations Christoph Strauch, Chin‐An Wang et al. Trends in Neurosciences profile →

Peers

Christoph Strauch

CN

SP

ECP

HI

SS

Ken Kihara Japan

Damien Litchfield United Kingdom

Thomas M. Spalek Canada

Björn Lidestam Sweden

Min‐Shik Kim South Korea

Brennis Lucero-Wagoner United States

Basil Wahn Germany

Francisco M. Costela United States

Roy Allen United Kingdom

Bettina Olk Germany

Ken Kihara Japan

Christoph Strauch

224 ×0.8

CN

176 ×1.4

SP

84 ×1.2

ECP

35 ×0.6

HI

12 ×0.2

SS

Citations per year, relative to Christoph Strauch Christoph Strauch (= 1×) peers Ken Kihara

Countries citing papers authored by Christoph Strauch

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christoph Strauch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christoph Strauch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christoph Strauch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christoph Strauch

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christoph Strauch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christoph Strauch. The network helps show where Christoph Strauch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christoph Strauch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christoph Strauch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christoph Strauch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christoph Strauch. Christoph Strauch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Stigchel, Stefan Van der, et al.. (2025). Uncovering Distinct Drivers of Covert Attention in Complex Environments With Pupillometry. Psychophysiology. 62(3). e70036–e70036.

2.

Naber, Marnix, et al.. (2025). Presaccadic Attention Shifts Up‐ and Downwards: Evidence From the Pupil Light Response. Psychophysiology. 62(3). e70047–e70047. 2 indexed citations

3.

Strauch, Christoph, et al.. (2025). Mapping simulated visual field defects with movie-viewing pupil perimetry. Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 263(6). 1641–1650. 1 indexed citations

4.

Naber, Marnix, et al.. (2024). Effort drives saccade selection. eLife. 13. 1 indexed citations

5.

Strauch, Christoph, et al.. (2024). Shifting reliance between the internal and external world: A meta-analysis on visual-working memory use. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 32(3). 1118–1130.

6.

Brink, Antonia F. Ten, et al.. (2024). Pupil dilation reveals the intensity of touch. Psychophysiology. 61(6). e14538–e14538.

7.

Strauch, Christoph. (2024). The forgotten wave of early pupillometry research. Trends in Neurosciences. 47(8). 571–572. 5 indexed citations

8.

Naber, Marnix, et al.. (2024). The Intensity of Internal and External Attention Assessed with Pupillometry. Journal of Cognition. 7(1). 8–8. 4 indexed citations

9.

Strauch, Christoph, et al.. (2024). Just-in-Time Encoding Into Visual Working Memory Is Contingent Upon Constant Availability of External Information. Journal of Cognition. 7(1). 39–39. 3 indexed citations

10.

Strauch, Christoph, et al.. (2023). Don't hide the instruction manual: A dynamic trade-off between using internal and external templates during visual search. Journal of Vision. 23(7). 14–14. 6 indexed citations

11.

Strauch, Christoph, et al.. (2023). Saliency models perform best for women’s and young adults' fixations. Communications Psychology. 1(1). 34–34. 3 indexed citations

12.

Brink, Antonia F. Ten, et al.. (2023). Uncovering the (un)attended: Pupil light responses index persistent biases of spatial attention in neglect. Cortex. 167. 101–114. 9 indexed citations

13.

Strauch, Christoph, Chin‐An Wang, Wolfgang Einhäuser, Stefan Van der Stigchel, & Marnix Naber. (2022). Pupillometry as an integrated readout of distinct attentional networks. Trends in Neurosciences. 45(8). 635–647. 114 indexed citations breakdown →

14.

Strauch, Christoph, et al.. (2022). Seeing the Forrest through the trees: Oculomotor metrics are linked to heart rate. PLoS ONE. 17(8). e0272349–e0272349. 3 indexed citations

15.

Strauch, Christoph, et al.. (2022). The orienting response drives pseudoneglect—Evidence from an objective pupillometric method. Cortex. 151. 259–271. 19 indexed citations

16.

Grön, Georg, et al.. (2021). Direct voluntary control of pupil constriction and dilation: Exploratory evidence from pupillometry, optometry, skin conductance, perception, and functional MRI. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 168. 33–42. 9 indexed citations

17.

Strauch, Christoph, et al.. (2021). Increasing pupil size is associated with improved detection performance in the periphery. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 84(1). 138–149. 16 indexed citations

18.

Strauch, Christoph, et al.. (2020). Pupil Dilation Fulfills the Requirements for Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment in Gaming on the Example of Pong. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1–9. 5 indexed citations

19.

Strauch, Christoph, et al.. (2018). Pupil dilation but not microsaccade rate robustly reveals decision formation. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 13165–13165. 16 indexed citations

20.

Strauch, Christoph, et al.. (2016). Pupil Size Changes as an Active Information Channel for Biofeedback Applications. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 41(3). 331–339. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact