Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
What is the Relationship between Risky Outdoor Play and Health in Children? A Systematic Review
2015339 citationsMariana Brussoni, Rebecca E. Gibbons et al.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthprofile →
What Is the Relationship between Outdoor Time and Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, and Physical Fitness in Children? A Systematic Review
2015325 citationsCasey Gray, Rebecca E. Gibbons et al.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Stanger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Stanger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Stanger more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Stanger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Stanger. The network helps show where Nick Stanger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nick Stanger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nick Stanger.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nick Stanger based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nick Stanger. Nick Stanger is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Stanger, Nick, et al.. (2020). Can We Teach the Earth Charter Anymore? A Critical Examination of the Earth Charter’s Role in Education. Canadian journal of environmental education. 23(3). 31–53.
Stanger, Nick. (2016). When Despair Grows in Us: Emotional Learning in (Trans)Formative Places.. Canadian journal of environmental education. 21. 145–162.4 indexed citations
7.
Gray, Casey, Rebecca E. Gibbons, Richard Larouche, et al.. (2015). What Is the Relationship between Outdoor Time and Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, and Physical Fitness in Children? A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 12(6). 6455–6474.325 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Brussoni, Mariana, Rebecca E. Gibbons, Casey Gray, et al.. (2015). What is the Relationship between Risky Outdoor Play and Health in Children? A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 12(6). 6423–6454.339 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Stanger, Nick, et al.. (2014). The Edge of Counselling: Mindful Negotiation of Emotions Towards Transforming Learning-Teaching. 469–502.3 indexed citations
Stanger, Nick. (2011). Moving "Eco" Back Into Socio-Ecological Models: A Proposal to Reorient Ecological Literacy Into Human Developmental Models and School Systems. Western CEDAR (Western Washington University). 18(2).19 indexed citations
12.
Stanger, Nick. (2011). The Intertextuality of Environmental Art in Childhood Special Places: How Play, Flow, and Pedagogy of Place can Reform Education. 5(1). 73–89.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.