Nick Medford
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Philosophy top 1%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Hugo CritchleyJohn H. GrowdonBarbara BrierleyElizabeth A. KensingerSuzanne CorkinAnthony S. DavidMauricio SierraLudovico Minati
- Topics
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (26 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (17 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Neuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyPsychiatry and Mental healthCognitive Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Nick Medford
38 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Cognitive Neuroscience 833
- Psychiatry and Mental health 764
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 339
- Philosophy 300
- Social Psychology 236
Countries citing papers authored by Nick Medford
This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Medford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Medford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Medford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Medford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Medford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Medford. The network helps show where Nick Medford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nick Medford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nick Medford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nick Medford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nick Medford. Nick Medford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 47 | |
| 8 | 53 | |
| 9 | 66 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 94 | |
| 16 | 71 | |
| 17 | 38 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 80 | |
| 20 | 18 |
About Nick Medford
Nick Medford is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy and General Decision Sciences, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (26 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (17 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (98 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (764 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (833 citations). Nick Medford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Hugo Critchley, John H. Growdon, Barbara Brierley, Elizabeth A. Kensinger, Suzanne Corkin, Anthony S. David, Mauricio Sierra, Ludovico Minati, Louis A. Sass and Elizabeth Pienkos. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Biological Psychiatry and Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.