Nick Cramer

1.4k citations
10 papers · 182 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Nick Cramer

10 papers receiving 171 citations

Peers

Nick Cramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 128
  • Artificial Intelligence 81
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 30
  • Information Systems and Management 14
  • Signal Processing 21
Replace Dominik Jäckle with:
Dominik Jäckle Germany
Fabian Sperrle Germany
Stuart Rose United States
Rongjian Lan United States
Helen Gibson United Kingdom
Benjamin M. Schmidt Germany
Megan Monroe United States
Wojciech Basalaj United Kingdom
Tomohiro Fukuhara Japan
Lars Grammel Canada
Nick Cramer relative to Dominik Jäckle Germany Dominik Jäckle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dominik Jäckle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Cramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Cramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Cramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Cramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Cramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Cramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Cramer. The network helps show where Nick Cramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick Cramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick Cramer Line = papers co-authored together Nick Cramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201642
2 200434
3 201530
4 200523
5
Visual Analysis of Weblog Content
200715
6 201311
7 201810
8 20056
9 20096
10 20045

About Nick Cramer

Nick Cramer is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Signal Processing and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 10 papers that have together received 182 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Visualization and Analytics (5 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (3 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (2 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (1 paper), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (1 paper), Species Distribution and Climate Change (1 paper), Geographic Information Systems Studies (1 paper) and Topic Modeling (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (128 citations), Artificial Intelligence (81 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (30 citations), Information Systems and Management (14 citations) and Signal Processing (21 citations). Nick Cramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kristin Cook, Russ Burtner, Alex Endert, S. Havre, Manmohan Singhal, Alan Turner, Anuj Shah, J. Joshua Thomas, Beth Hetzler and Samuel Payne. Their work appears in journals such as Information Visualization, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics and University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact