Benjamin M. Schmidt

13 papers receiving 151 citations

Peers

Benjamin M. Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Human-Computer Interaction 34
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 55
  • Health Informatics 3
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 14
  • Signal Processing 20
Replace Robert K. France with:
Robert K. France United States
Nick Cramer United States
Shah Rukh Humayoun Germany
Anja Habacha Chaïbi Tunisia
Claus Atzenbeck Denmark
Spence Green United States
Vivek Ramavajjala United States
Tomohiro Fukuhara Japan
Rotem Dror Israel
Lukács László Hungary
Benjamin M. Schmidt relative to Robert K. France United States Robert K. France's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Robert K. France · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin M. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin M. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin M. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin M. Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin M. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin M. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin M. Schmidt. The network helps show where Benjamin M. Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin M. Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin M. Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin M. Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201336
2 200729
3 202427
4 201326
5 201418
6 20156
7 20215
8 20184
9 20232
10 20142
11 20012
12 20211
13 19851
14 20141
15 20021
16
Adding Flexibility to Large-Scale Text Visualization with HathiTrust+Bookworm.
20160
17 19990
18 20010
19 19990

About Benjamin M. Schmidt

Benjamin M. Schmidt is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Human-Computer Interaction and Information Systems, having authored 19 papers that have together received 161 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Visualization and Analytics (4 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (3 papers), Topic Modeling (3 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (2 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (2 papers), Academic Freedom and Politics (1 paper) and Library Science and Information Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (34 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (55 citations), Health Informatics (3 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (14 citations) and Signal Processing (20 citations). Benjamin M. Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Matthew M. Chingos, Daniel Weiskopf, Michael Burch, Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Niels Henze, Albrecht Schmidt, Philipp Berens, Dmitry Kobak, Shengdong Zhao and Paweł W. Woźniak. Their work appears in journals such as The Germanic Review Literature Culture Theory, PS Political Science & Politics, World Patent Information, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology and Patterns.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact