Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Progressive Keratoconus
2014454 citationsElsie Chan, Amirul Islam et al.Ophthalmologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Whiting's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Whiting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Whiting more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Whiting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Whiting. The network helps show where Mark Whiting may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Whiting
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Whiting.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Whiting based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Whiting. Mark Whiting is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Scholtz, Jean & Mark Whiting. (2009). User-Centered Evaluation of Technosocial Predictive Analytics. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 126–129.3 indexed citations
10.
Plaisant, Catherine, Georges Grinstein, Jean Scholtz, et al.. (2008). Evaluating Visual Analytics: The 2007 Visual Analytics Science and Technology Symposium Contest | NIST. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.4 indexed citations
Morgan, Philip B., et al.. (2005). Response to comment on 'Incidence of keratitis of varying severity among contact lens wearers'. Centre for Health Research; Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation.3 indexed citations
14.
Efron, Nathan, et al.. (2005). Incidence and Morbidity of Contact Lens–Associated Keratitis and Relevant Risk Factors: A 12 Month Hospital–Based Survey. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 46(13). 927–927.1 indexed citations
15.
Pullum, Kenneth W., Mark Whiting, & Roger Buckley. (2005). Scleral Contact Lenses. Cornea. 24(3). 269–277.150 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.