Nicholas Thomas-Peter
- Artificial Intelligence top 1%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Computational Mechanics
- Co-authors
- Ian A. WalmsleyBrian J. SmithPeter G. R. SmithDmytro KundysNathan K. LangfordBenjamin J. MetcalfJustin B. SpringAnimesh Datta
- Topics
- Quantum Information and Cryptography (11 papers)Photonic and Optical Devices (6 papers)Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomChinaSingapore
In The Last Decade
Nicholas Thomas-Peter
13 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Artificial Intelligence 924
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 793
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 526
- Biomedical Engineering 82
- Computational Mechanics 59
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Thomas-Peter
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Thomas-Peter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Thomas-Peter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Thomas-Peter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Thomas-Peter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Thomas-Peter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Thomas-Peter. The network helps show where Nicholas Thomas-Peter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas Thomas-Peter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas Thomas-Peter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas Thomas-Peter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas Thomas-Peter. Nicholas Thomas-Peter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 135 | |
| 3 | 107 | |
| 4 | Experimental Boson Sampling | 1 |
| 5 | 66 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | Boson Sampling on a Photonic Chipbreakdown → | 544 |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 84 | |
| 10 | 84 | |
| 11 | 57 | |
| 12 | 93 | |
| 13 | 35 | |
| 14 | 1 |
About Nicholas Thomas-Peter
Nicholas Thomas-Peter is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Instrumentation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (11 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (6 papers) and Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Acoustics and Ultrasonics (30 citations), Artificial Intelligence (924 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (793 citations). Nicholas Thomas-Peter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Ian A. Walmsley, Brian J. Smith, Peter G. R. Smith, Dmytro Kundys, Nathan K. Langford, Benjamin J. Metcalf, Justin B. Spring, Animesh Datta, James C. Gates and Marco Barbieri. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Physical Review Letters and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.