Nicholas M. Smith

80 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Nicholas M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Molecular Medicine 203
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 46
  • Internal Medicine 46
  • Urology 63
  • Pharmacology 146
Replace David J. Feola with:
David J. Feola United States
W. R. Klein Netherlands
Murat Aral Türkiye
Wim Calame Netherlands
Lili Tao China
M. Millar United Kingdom
Jimyung Kim South Korea
Yasuhiro Kawai Japan
Pinhua Pan China
Nicholas M. Smith relative to David J. Feola United States David J. Feola's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.8×
David J. Feola · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas M. Smith. The network helps show where Nicholas M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas M. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas M. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas M. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994230
2 2006181
3 199987
4 199785
5 199275
6 201771
7 199851
8 199342
9 202041
10 199740
11 201539
12 200239
13 201636
14 200730
15 199129
16 201928
17 198326
18 199725
19 202124
20 198723

About Nicholas M. Smith

Nicholas M. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Medicine, Surgery, Pharmacology, Epidemiology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (16 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (11 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (6 papers), Respiratory viral infections research (4 papers), Tumors and Oncological Cases (4 papers), Parvovirus B19 Infection Studies (3 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (3 papers) and Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (203 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (46 citations), Internal Medicine (46 citations), Urology (63 citations) and Pharmacology (146 citations). Nicholas M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Cherian, David Forbes, Philip M. Bath, Michael T. Simonich, Roger W. Innes, Sherryl R. Bisgrove, Rohan Pathansali, Brian T. Tsuji, Birgit Fischer Hansen and Inger Kjær. Their work appears in journals such as Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy and Open Forum Infectious Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact