Nicholas King

25 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Nicholas King
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Genetics 641
  • Cancer Research 276
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 138
  • Physiology 65
  • Oncology 353
Replace Victor Dosenko with:
Victor Dosenko Ukraine
Camille Attané France
A. Kurtz Germany
Niels Korsgaard Denmark
S Umemura Japan
Christoph Zechner United States
Sarah H. Lindsey United States
Ersilia Cipolletta Italy
Ewa Karwatowska‐Prokopczuk United States
Robert Bränström Sweden
Nicholas King relative to Victor Dosenko Ukraine Victor Dosenko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
Victor Dosenko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas King. The network helps show where Nicholas King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas King Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996288
2
In vivo inhibition of aromatization by exemestane, a novel irreversible aromatase inhibitor, in postmenopausal breast cancer patients.
1998271
3 2005130
4 2003114
5
Exon 5 deletion variant estrogen receptor messenger RNA expression in relation to tamoxifen resistance and progesterone receptor/pS2 status in human breast cancer.
199592
6 200589
7 200559
8 199233
9 200233
10 199831
11 200830
12 201029
13 199414
14 200711
15 202410
16 20179
17 19928
18 20247
19 20095
20 19955

About Nicholas King

Nicholas King is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Genetics, Physiology, Oncology and Neurology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Estrogen and related hormone effects (9 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (5 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (5 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (3 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (641 citations), Cancer Research (276 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (138 citations), Physiology (65 citations) and Oncology (353 citations). Nicholas King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Mitch Dowsett, Lawrence I. Sinoway, Per Eystein Lønning, Jürgen Geisler, Jianhua Li, Gun Anker, E. Di Salle, G. Ornati, Lars Ottestad and P. Walton. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Cancer, European Journal of Cancer, Circulation, Journal of Applied Physiology and American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact