Nicholas Harrigan

28 papers receiving 430 citations

Peers

Nicholas Harrigan
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Sociology and Political Science 209
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 93
  • Artificial Intelligence 75
  • General Health Professions 70
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 59
Replace Zack W. Almquist with:
Zack W. Almquist United States
Aili Malm United States
Oliver McClellan United States
Laura Mazzoli Smith United Kingdom
Sarah Taylor United States
Gideon Vigderhous Canada
Arie Perliger United States
Marc Trussler United States
Christopher Prosser United Kingdom
Uri Shwed Israel
Nicholas Harrigan relative to Zack W. Almquist United States Zack W. Almquist's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Zack W. Almquist · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Harrigan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Harrigan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Harrigan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Harrigan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Harrigan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Harrigan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Harrigan. The network helps show where Nicholas Harrigan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas Harrigan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas Harrigan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas Harrigan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas Harrigan. Nicholas Harrigan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 3
4 0
5 0
6 1
7 2
8 9
9 14
10 10
11 6
12 24
13 17
14 25
15
Vital yet vulnerable: Mental and emotional health of South Asian migrant Workers in Singapore
10
16
Influentials, Novelty, and Social Contagion: The Viral Power of Average Friends, Close Communities, and Old News
5
17
The Political Mobilization of Corporate Directors: Socio-Economic Correlates of Affiliation to European Pressure Groups
1
18 19
19 52
20
PNet for Dummies: An Introduction to Estimating Exponential Random Graph (P*) Models with PNet
5

About Nicholas Harrigan

Nicholas Harrigan is a scholar working on Public Administration, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 453 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers) and Migration and Labor Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (93 citations), Communication (49 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (209 citations). Nicholas Harrigan has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Singapore and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Palakorn Achananuparp, Ee‐Peng Lim, Terry Rudolph, Giuseppe Labianca, Filip Agneessens, Yeong-Cherng Liang, Stephen D. Bartlett, Matthew Bond, Jie Zhuo and Laura Dodds. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Social Science & Medicine and Journal of Hydrology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026