Nicholas E. Clifton
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Genetics
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jérémy HallKerrie L. ThomasSimon TrentAndrew PocklingtonGary DonohoeJakob SeidlitzEdward T. BullmoreAiden Corvin
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers)Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (7 papers)Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSingapore
In The Last Decade
Nicholas E. Clifton
19 papers receiving 635 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Cognitive Neuroscience 248
- Molecular Biology 241
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 158
- Genetics 114
- Biological Psychiatry 99
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas E. Clifton
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas E. Clifton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas E. Clifton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas E. Clifton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas E. Clifton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas E. Clifton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas E. Clifton. The network helps show where Nicholas E. Clifton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas E. Clifton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas E. Clifton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas E. Clifton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas E. Clifton. Nicholas E. Clifton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 90 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | Cortical patterning of abnormal morphometric similarity in psychosis is associated with brain expression of schizophrenia-related genesbreakdown → | 228 |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 55 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 47 |
About Nicholas E. Clifton
Nicholas E. Clifton is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 21 papers that have together received 641 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (7 papers) and Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (99 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (248 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (43 citations). Nicholas E. Clifton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Jérémy Hall, Kerrie L. Thomas, Simon Trent, Andrew Pocklington, Gary Donohoe, Jakob Seidlitz, Edward T. Bullmore, Aiden Corvin, Cristina Scarpazza and Thérèse van Amelsvoort. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Brain and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.