Shuling Gao
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Child Abuse and Trauma 5
- COVID-19 and Mental Health 2
- Resilience and Mental Health 1
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 1
-
- Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion 2
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 1
- Co-authors
- Mark Assink (6 shared papers)Andrea Cipriani (1 shared paper)Kangguang Lin (1 shared paper)Ko Ling Chan (8 shared papers)Patrick Ip (2 shared papers)Xianxin Meng (4 shared papers)Ling Zhang (2 shared papers)Shimin Chen (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Trauma Violence & Abuse (5 papers)Clinical Psychology Review (1 paper)Journal of Affective Disorders (1 paper)Acta Psychologica (1 paper)School Mental Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ChinaHong KongNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Shuling Gao
11 papers receiving 343 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Clinical Psychology 186
- Social Psychology 131
- Health 42
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 60
- Applied Psychology 19
Countries citing papers authored by Shuling Gao
This map shows the geographic impact of Shuling Gao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shuling Gao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shuling Gao more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shuling Gao
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shuling Gao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shuling Gao. The network helps show where Shuling Gao may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Shuling Gao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 209 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 59 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 24 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 1 |
About Shuling Gao
Shuling Gao is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Health, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 11 papers that have together received 350 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Resilience and Mental Health (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (186 citations), Social Psychology (131 citations), Health (42 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (60 citations) and Applied Psychology (19 citations). Shuling Gao has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Mark Assink, Andrea Cipriani, Kangguang Lin, Ko Ling Chan, Patrick Ip, Xianxin Meng, Ling Zhang, Shimin Chen, Chongzeng Bi and Jixiang Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Trauma Violence & Abuse, Clinical Psychology Review, Journal of Affective Disorders, Acta Psychologica and School Mental Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.