Nicholas Babidge
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Papers in
-
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints 1
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 1
-
- Child Abuse and Related Trauma 1
- Co-authors
- Neil Buhrich (1 shared paper)Tony Butler (1 shared paper)Olav Nielssen (3 shared papers)Matthew Large (3 shared papers)Philip Storey (1 shared paper)Gin S. Malhi (1 shared paper)Nick Glozier (1 shared paper)Peter Tyrer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (1 paper)Schizophrenia Bulletin (1 paper)American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology (1 paper)Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomGambia
In The Last Decade
Nicholas Babidge
5 papers receiving 236 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Clinical Psychology 92
- Psychiatry and Mental health 55
- General Health Professions 71
- Emergency Medicine 21
- Ophthalmology 16
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Babidge
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Babidge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Babidge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Babidge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Babidge
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Babidge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Babidge. The network helps show where Nicholas Babidge may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Babidge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 112 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 84 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 6 |
About Nicholas Babidge
Nicholas Babidge is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Neurology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 5 papers that have together received 254 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper), Child Abuse and Related Trauma (1 paper), Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (1 paper), Neurology and Historical Studies (1 paper), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper) and Poisoning and overdose treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (92 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (55 citations), General Health Professions (71 citations), Emergency Medicine (21 citations) and Ophthalmology (16 citations). Nicholas Babidge has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Gambia. Frequent co-authors include Neil Buhrich, Tony Butler, Olav Nielssen, Matthew Large, Philip Storey, Gin S. Malhi, Nick Glozier and Peter Tyrer. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Schizophrenia Bulletin, American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.