Niamh O’Sullivan

582 citations
23 papers · 341 indexed · h-index 10

Niamh O’Sullivan

19 papers receiving 319 citations

Peers

Niamh O’Sullivan
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Strategy and Management 158
  • Marketing 73
  • Surgery 66
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 63
  • Accounting 57
Replace Kimberly D. Krawiec with:
Kimberly D. Krawiec United States
Jørn Flohr Nielsen Denmark
Gillian Vesty Australia
Lars Jacob Tynes Pedersen Norway
Maryam Safari Australia
Hilco J. van Elten Netherlands
Carolyn Fowler New Zealand
Pam Lewis United Kingdom
Robert Inglis Australia
A Merriman United Kingdom
Niamh O’Sullivan relative to Kimberly D. Krawiec United States Kimberly D. Krawiec's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Kimberly D. Krawiec · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Niamh O’Sullivan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Niamh O’Sullivan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Niamh O’Sullivan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Niamh O’Sullivan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Niamh O’Sullivan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Niamh O’Sullivan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Niamh O’Sullivan. The network helps show where Niamh O’Sullivan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Niamh O’Sullivan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Niamh O’Sullivan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Niamh O’Sullivan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Niamh O’Sullivan. Niamh O’Sullivan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 1
3 5
4 2
5 11
6 10
7 25
8 9
9
The Untapped Potential of Mauritania’s Entrepreneurial Ecosystem – Lessons from the Entrepreneur's Marathon
0
10 1
11
How ESG Engagement Creates Value for Investors and Companies
7
12 76
13 10
14
Stakeholder Perspectives on a Financial Sector Legitimation Process: The Case of NGOs and the Equator Principles
13
15 103
16 7
17 38
18 1
19 2
20 1

About Niamh O’Sullivan

Niamh O’Sullivan is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Strategy and Management and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 23 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (4 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers) and Irish and British Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (158 citations), Marketing (73 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (63 citations). Niamh O’Sullivan has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Brendan O’Dwyer, Jean‐Pascal Gond, Alain Sautet, C. Dumontier, Geoffroy Nourissat, Levon Doursounian, C. Wild, Yvonne C. Anderson, Paul L. Hofman and Esther Willing. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrients, Accounting Organizations and Society and Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026