Neville Clark
- Materials Chemistry
- Condensed Matter Physics top 10%
- Mechanical Engineering
- Inorganic Chemistry top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- Ian J. McColmF D PooleyRachel BrownAbeyou W. WorqlulRaghavan SrinivasanYihun T. DileThomas J. GerikE. Wu
- Topics
- Rare-earth and actinide compounds (10 papers)Nuclear Materials and Properties (9 papers)Advanced materials and composites (8 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyThe Journal of Physical ChemistryJournal of Catalysis
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomCosta Rica
In The Last Decade
Neville Clark
41 papers receiving 590 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Materials Chemistry 210
- Condensed Matter Physics 123
- Mechanical Engineering 106
- Inorganic Chemistry 97
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 94
Countries citing papers authored by Neville Clark
This map shows the geographic impact of Neville Clark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neville Clark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neville Clark more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neville Clark
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neville Clark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neville Clark. The network helps show where Neville Clark may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neville Clark
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neville Clark. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neville Clark based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neville Clark. Neville Clark is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 129 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 36 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | SODIUM POTASSIUM RATIOS IN SYDNEY BROWN HAZE | 1 |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | Interpreting the Resurrection | 1 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Neville Clark
Neville Clark is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Ceramics and Composites and Materials Chemistry, having authored 45 papers that have together received 638 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rare-earth and actinide compounds (10 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (9 papers) and Advanced materials and composites (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (123 citations), Catalysis (58 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (97 citations). Neville Clark has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Costa Rica. Frequent co-authors include Ian J. McColm, F D Pooley, Rachel Brown, Abeyou W. Worqlul, Raghavan Srinivasan, Yihun T. Dile, Thomas J. Gerik, E. Wu, Jaehak Jeong and Petra Schmitter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Physical Chemistry and Journal of Catalysis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.