Nesrine Rahmouni
- Physiology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Molecular Biology
- Neurology
- Co-authors
- Pedro Rosa‐NetoJoseph TherriaultCécile TissotJenna StevensonAndréa Lessa BenedetKaj BlennowWagner S. BrumStijn Servaes
- Topics
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (28 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (22 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesSweden
In The Last Decade
Nesrine Rahmouni
33 papers receiving 287 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Physiology 190
- Psychiatry and Mental health 161
- Cognitive Neuroscience 48
- Molecular Biology 45
- Neurology 41
Countries citing papers authored by Nesrine Rahmouni
This map shows the geographic impact of Nesrine Rahmouni's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nesrine Rahmouni with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nesrine Rahmouni more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nesrine Rahmouni
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nesrine Rahmouni. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nesrine Rahmouni. The network helps show where Nesrine Rahmouni may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nesrine Rahmouni
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nesrine Rahmouni. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nesrine Rahmouni based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nesrine Rahmouni. Nesrine Rahmouni is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 33 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | A two-step workflow based on plasma p-tau217 to screen for amyloid β positivity with further confirmatory testing only in uncertain casesbreakdown → | 101 |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Nesrine Rahmouni
Nesrine Rahmouni is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology and Neurology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (28 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (22 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (161 citations), Physiology (190 citations) and Neurology (41 citations). Nesrine Rahmouni has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Joseph Therriault, Cécile Tissot, Jenna Stevenson, Andréa Lessa Benedet, Kaj Blennow, Wagner S. Brum, Stijn Servaes, Nicholas J. Ashton and Gallen Triana‐Baltzer. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Science Translational Medicine and Neurobiology of Aging.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.