Nelleke P.M. Brouwer
- Oncology top 10%
- Surgery
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Co-authors
- Johannes H.W. de WiltIrıs D. NagtegaalRob H.A. VerhoevenV.E.P.P. LemmensPieter J. TanisNiek HugenAmanda C. R. K. BosRutger C. H. Stijns
- Topics
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (9 papers)Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (9 papers)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Nelleke P.M. Brouwer
18 papers receiving 513 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Oncology 360
- Surgery 164
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 98
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 91
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 76
Countries citing papers authored by Nelleke P.M. Brouwer
This map shows the geographic impact of Nelleke P.M. Brouwer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nelleke P.M. Brouwer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nelleke P.M. Brouwer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nelleke P.M. Brouwer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nelleke P.M. Brouwer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nelleke P.M. Brouwer. The network helps show where Nelleke P.M. Brouwer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nelleke P.M. Brouwer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nelleke P.M. Brouwer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nelleke P.M. Brouwer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nelleke P.M. Brouwer. Nelleke P.M. Brouwer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 40 | |
| 15 | 81 | |
| 16 | 218 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 11 |
About Nelleke P.M. Brouwer
Nelleke P.M. Brouwer is a scholar working on Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Surgery, having authored 18 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (9 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (9 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (360 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (91 citations) and Health Informatics (6 citations). Nelleke P.M. Brouwer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Johannes H.W. de Wilt, Irıs D. Nagtegaal, Rob H.A. Verhoeven, V.E.P.P. Lemmens, Pieter J. Tanis, Niek Hugen, Amanda C. R. K. Bos, Rutger C. H. Stijns, Jurgen J. Fütterer and Regina G. H. Beets‐Tan. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Clinical Oncology and International Journal of Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.