Shannon van Vliet

2.6k total citations
17 papers, 225 citations indexed

About

Shannon van Vliet is a scholar working on Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Shannon van Vliet has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 225 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Oncology, 10 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 4 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Shannon van Vliet's work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (9 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (8 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers). Shannon van Vliet is often cited by papers focused on Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (9 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (8 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers). Shannon van Vliet collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Shannon van Vliet's co-authors include Irıs D. Nagtegaal, Miriam Koopman, Marjolijn J. L. Ligtenberg, Cornelis J.A. Punt, Femke Simmer, Eveline J. Kamping, M. Elisa Vink-Börger, Gerrit A. Meijer, Eugène T.P. Verwiel and Jeroen R. Dijkstra and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Gastroenterology and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Shannon van Vliet

15 papers receiving 224 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Shannon van Vliet Netherlands 9 116 91 68 65 53 17 225
Alicia Latham United States 7 75 0.6× 112 1.2× 31 0.5× 84 1.3× 41 0.8× 26 209
C Singer Austria 9 126 1.1× 68 0.7× 93 1.4× 97 1.5× 81 1.5× 15 314
Yumi Terakado Japan 8 85 0.7× 38 0.4× 102 1.5× 57 0.9× 137 2.6× 9 255
Thais Maloberti Italy 6 62 0.5× 29 0.3× 54 0.8× 38 0.6× 32 0.6× 40 164
Shiangjiin Leaw China 8 166 1.4× 39 0.4× 87 1.3× 55 0.8× 22 0.4× 13 237
Yibaina Wang China 11 113 1.0× 124 1.4× 157 2.3× 102 1.6× 30 0.6× 14 298
Sreelakshmi Mallappa United Kingdom 6 146 1.3× 26 0.3× 56 0.8× 50 0.8× 69 1.3× 14 219
Kai-Keen Shiu United Kingdom 3 153 1.3× 64 0.7× 51 0.8× 51 0.8× 34 0.6× 4 207
Hannah Maynard United States 5 197 1.7× 39 0.4× 68 1.0× 139 2.1× 29 0.5× 13 235
Farida Mesli France 4 115 1.0× 50 0.5× 80 1.2× 75 1.2× 55 1.0× 5 231

Countries citing papers authored by Shannon van Vliet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shannon van Vliet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shannon van Vliet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shannon van Vliet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shannon van Vliet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shannon van Vliet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shannon van Vliet. The network helps show where Shannon van Vliet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shannon van Vliet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shannon van Vliet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shannon van Vliet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shannon van Vliet. Shannon van Vliet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Bokhorst, John‐Melle, Shannon van Vliet, Kiek Verrijp, et al.. (2025). Tumor budding and poorly differentiated clusters as a biological continuum in colorectal cancer invasion and prognosis. Scientific Reports. 15(1). 16944–16944.
2.
Vliet, Shannon van, Liudmila L. Kodach, Francesco Ciompi, et al.. (2024). Biological background of colorectal polyps and carcinomas with heterotopic ossification: A national study and literature review. Human Pathology. 145. 34–41.
3.
Brouwer, Nelleke P.M., Shannon van Vliet, Joanna IntHout, et al.. (2024). Tumour deposits are associated with worse survival than extranodal extension; a network meta‐analysis on tumour nodules in colorectal cancer. Histopathology. 86(4). 485–496. 1 indexed citations
4.
Brouwer, Nelleke P.M., Shannon van Vliet, Pascal W.T.C. Jansen, et al.. (2023). Transcriptomics and proteomics reveal distinct biology for lymph node metastases and tumour deposits in colorectal cancer. The Journal of Pathology. 261(4). 401–412. 15 indexed citations
5.
Nijman, Isaäc J., Kiek Verrijp, Nigel B. Jamieson, et al.. (2023). Pseudobudding: ruptured glands do not represent true tumor buds. The Journal of Pathology. 261(1). 19–27. 7 indexed citations
6.
Bitter, Tessa J.J. de, Philip R. de Reuver, Leonie I. Kroeze, et al.. (2022). Comprehensive clinicopathological and genomic profiling of gallbladder cancer reveals actionable targets in half of patients. npj Precision Oncology. 6(1). 15 indexed citations
7.
Ansems, Marleen, et al.. (2022). The immune microenvironment landscape shows treatment-specific differences in rectal cancer patients. Frontiers in Immunology. 13. 1011498–1011498. 7 indexed citations
8.
Swets, Marloes, Shannon van Vliet, Hans Gelderblom, et al.. (2022). Microsatellite instability in rectal cancer: what does it mean? A study of two randomized trials and a systematic review of the literature. Histopathology. 81(3). 352–362. 18 indexed citations
9.
Bitter, Tessa J.J. de, Leonie I. Kroeze, Philip R. de Reuver, et al.. (2021). Unraveling Neuroendocrine Gallbladder Cancer: Comprehensive Clinicopathologic and Molecular Characterization. JCO Precision Oncology. 5(5). 473–484. 12 indexed citations
10.
Simmer, Femke, Marjolijn J. L. Ligtenberg, Bauke Ylstra, et al.. (2020). Multifocal Colorectal Cancer—Do Intraluminal Metastases Occur?. Gastroenterology. 160(5). 1853–1855. 3 indexed citations
11.
Simons, Michiel, Femke Simmer, Johan Bulten, et al.. (2019). Two types of primary mucinous ovarian tumors can be distinguished based on their origin. Modern Pathology. 33(4). 722–733. 26 indexed citations
12.
Knijn, Nikki, Carlijn van de Water, Shannon van Vliet, et al.. (2019). Sequencing of RAS/RAF pathway genes in primary colorectal cancer and matched liver and lung metastases. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 39(1). 2 indexed citations
13.
Bitter, Tessa J.J. de, Shannon van Vliet, Daoud Sie, et al.. (2019). Colorectal metastasis to the gallbladder mimicking a primary gallbladder malignancy: histopathological and molecular characteristics. Histopathology. 75(3). 394–404. 7 indexed citations
14.
Derikx, Lauranne, Lisa Smits, Shannon van Vliet, et al.. (2016). Colorectal Cancer Risk in Patients With Lynch Syndrome and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 15(3). 454–458.e1. 22 indexed citations
15.
Venderbosch, Sabine, Shannon van Vliet, Anton F. J. de Haan, et al.. (2015). EMAST Is Associated with a Poor Prognosis in Microsatellite Instable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. PLoS ONE. 10(4). e0124538–e0124538. 27 indexed citations
16.
Venderbosch, Sabine, Shannon van Vliet, Femke Simmer, et al.. (2015). Mitochondrial microsatellite instability in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin. 466(5). 495–502. 8 indexed citations
17.
Mekenkamp, Leonie J., Jolien Tol, Jeroen R. Dijkstra, et al.. (2012). Beyond KRAS mutation status: influence of KRAScopy number status and microRNAs on clinical outcome to cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 12(1). 292–292. 55 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alicia Latham Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C Singer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Yumi Terakado Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Thais Maloberti Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shiangjiin Leaw Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Yibaina Wang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sreelakshmi Mallappa Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kai-Keen Shiu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hannah Maynard Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Farida Mesli
Rankless by CCL
2026